On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Paul Osmialowski wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jul 2015, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
>> I want Shawn and Sascha to look at this as they worked with
>> other Freescale pin controllers. Especially I want to know if this
>> is a sibling to the other Freescale controllers or a separa
Hi Linus,
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015, Linus Walleij wrote:
> OK...
>
> I want Shawn and Sascha to look at this as they worked with
> other Freescale pin controllers. Especially I want to know if this
> is a sibling to the other Freescale controllers or a separate hardware.
>
> If it is *not* a sibling
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:19 PM, Paul Osmialowski wrote:
> This is very cheap and simple implementation of pinctrl driver
> for Kinetis SoC - its primary role is to provide means for enabling UART
> fuctionality on I/O PORT_E which will be utilized by the commits
> yet to come.
>
> Signed-off-by:
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your comments. I'll make it tristate.
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 23:19 +0200, Paul Osmialowski wrote:
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/Kconfig
+config PINCTRL_KINETIS
+ bool "Kinetis pinctrl
On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 23:19 +0200, Paul Osmialowski wrote:
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/Kconfig
> +config PINCTRL_KINETIS
> + bool "Kinetis pinctrl driver"
> + depends on OF
> + depends on SOC_K70
> + select PINMUX
> + help
> +
This is very cheap and simple implementation of pinctrl driver
for Kinetis SoC - its primary role is to provide means for enabling UART
fuctionality on I/O PORT_E which will be utilized by the commits
yet to come.
Signed-off-by: Paul Osmialowski
---
.../bindings/pinctrl/fsl,kinetis-pinctrl.txt
