It would be better to name OPP nodes as opp@ as that will ensure
that multiple DT nodes don't contain the same frequency. Of course we
expect the writer to name the node with its opp-hz frequency and not any
other frequency.
And that will let the compile error out if multiple nodes are using the
On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 07:11:55AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> It would be better to name OPP nodes as opp@ as that will ensure
> that multiple DT nodes don't contain the same frequency. Of course we
> expect the writer to name the node with its opp-hz frequency and not any
> other frequency.
>
