Re: [PATCH V5 1/3] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings

2015-05-25 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 22-05-15, 10:55, Rob Herring wrote: > > Rob suggested opp- prefix and it looks good to me, lets see what > > others have to say :) > > You can decide the color of the bike shed. I like that color more :) -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in th

Re: [PATCH V5 1/3] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings

2015-05-25 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 21-05-15, 00:27, Nishanth Menon wrote: > I would suggest adding a link to how future vendor specific extension > docs might look like - maybe this is probably not the time to discuss > this.. but anyways.. we could make some statement to the effect of "SoC > vendor specfic extensions are documen

Re: [PATCH V5 1/3] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings

2015-05-22 Thread Rob Herring
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:46 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 21-05-15, 00:27, Nishanth Menon wrote: >> > +This describes the OPPs belonging to a device. This node can have >> > following >> > +properties: [...] >> different angle: How about just target-freq-Hz? just drop the "opp" >> prefix for p

Re: [PATCH V5 1/3] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings

2015-05-20 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 21-05-15, 00:58, Nishanth Menon wrote: > I assume you meant [1] which in turn pointed to [2]. Thanks, will do so. Right. -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger

Re: [PATCH V5 1/3] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings

2015-05-20 Thread Nishanth Menon
On 05/21/2015 12:46 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 21-05-15, 00:27, Nishanth Menon wrote: >>> +This describes the OPPs belonging to a device. This node can have following >>> +properties: >>> + >>> +Required properties: >>> +- compatible: Allow OPPs to express their compatibility. It should be: >>> +

Re: [PATCH V5 1/3] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings

2015-05-20 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 21-05-15, 00:27, Nishanth Menon wrote: > > +This describes the OPPs belonging to a device. This node can have following > > +properties: > > + > > +Required properties: > > +- compatible: Allow OPPs to express their compatibility. It should be: > > + "operating-points-v2". > > + > > +- OPP node

Re: [PATCH V5 1/3] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings

2015-05-20 Thread Nishanth Menon
$subject: (Rafael usually hand fixes it.. but might be nice of us not to save him that effort) PM / OPP: Additional binding definition to address ... we are not really redefining the old definitions.. On 05/19/2015 10:41 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Current OPP (Operating performance point) DT bindi