Re: [PATCH V7 1/3] OPP: Add new bindings to address shortcomings of existing bindings

2015-06-16 Thread Nishanth Menon
On 06/04/2015 11:20 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: Current OPP (Operating performance point) device tree bindings have been insufficient due to the inflexible nature of the original bindings. Over time, we have realized that Operating Performance Point definitions and usage is varied depending on the

Re: [PATCH V7 1/3] OPP: Add new bindings to address shortcomings of existing bindings

2015-06-04 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 04-06-15, 11:37, Stephen Boyd wrote: Ok. I'm still interested to see if this binding will have to change to support how multiple regulators will be matched up with the device using the OPP. I can understand your concern here, but getting everything working on the first attempt would be

Re: [PATCH V7 1/3] OPP: Add new bindings to address shortcomings of existing bindings

2015-06-04 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 06/04, Viresh Kumar wrote: Current OPP (Operating performance point) device tree bindings have been insufficient due to the inflexible nature of the original bindings. Over time, we have realized that Operating Performance Point definitions and usage is varied depending on the SoC and a

[PATCH V7 1/3] OPP: Add new bindings to address shortcomings of existing bindings

2015-06-04 Thread Viresh Kumar
Current OPP (Operating performance point) device tree bindings have been insufficient due to the inflexible nature of the original bindings. Over time, we have realized that Operating Performance Point definitions and usage is varied depending on the SoC and a single size (just frequency, voltage)