On Jan 8, 2014, at 7:50 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 01/08/14 13:37, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Tuesday 24 December 2013, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> This is a rework of patches sent a months back by Rohit[1].
>>> The goal of these patches is to add support for SMP and (basic)
>>> hotplug on MSM bas
On 01/08/14 13:37, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 December 2013, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> This is a rework of patches sent a months back by Rohit[1].
>> The goal of these patches is to add support for SMP and (basic)
>> hotplug on MSM based SoCs. To get there, we add support for a
>> generic wa
On Tuesday 24 December 2013, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This is a rework of patches sent a months back by Rohit[1].
> The goal of these patches is to add support for SMP and (basic)
> hotplug on MSM based SoCs. To get there, we add support for a
> generic way to hook in SMP/hotplug support code based on
Hi Stephen,
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 10:19:11PM +, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Ping? Can anyone take a look at the generic ARM and DT binding patches
> and provide acks/reviews? I'd like to send this through arm-soc via the
> MSM tree if possible.
Apologies for the delay. It's taking a while to warm
Ping? Can anyone take a look at the generic ARM and DT binding patches
and provide acks/reviews? I'd like to send this through arm-soc via the
MSM tree if possible.
On 12/23/13 16:39, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> This is a rework of patches sent a months back by Rohit[1].
> The goal of these patches is t
This is a rework of patches sent a months back by Rohit[1].
The goal of these patches is to add support for SMP and (basic)
hotplug on MSM based SoCs. To get there, we add support for a
generic way to hook in SMP/hotplug support code based on DT. To
show how it's used, we convert the MSM8660 SMP su
