Hi Thomas,
On 15/01/2015 09:24, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
Dear Gregory CLEMENT,
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:50:07 +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
Any reason to use 0x184A0 0xC instead of 0x184A8 0x4 ? According to
the datasheet, there is only this 184A8 register for RTC stuff.
Yes but according
Dear Gregory CLEMENT,
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:50:07 +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
Any reason to use 0x184A0 0xC instead of 0x184A8 0x4 ? According to
the datasheet, there is only this 184A8 register for RTC stuff.
Yes but according to the code I saw there were other registers related to
Dear Gregory CLEMENT,
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:39:11 +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
+Required properties:
+- compatible : Should be marvell,armada-380-rtc
+- reg: physical base address of the controller and length of memory
+ mapped region, associated to the reg-name rtc. The other entry is
+
Hi Thomas,
On 14/01/2015 20:22, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
Dear Gregory CLEMENT,
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:39:11 +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
+Required properties:
+- compatible : Should be marvell,armada-380-rtc
+- reg: physical base address of the controller and length of memory
+ mapped
The Armada 38x SoCs come with a new RTC which differs from the one
used in the other mvebu SoCs until now. This patch describes the
binding of this RTC.
Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT gregory.clem...@free-electrons.com
---
.../devicetree/bindings/rtc/armada-380-rtc.txt | 22