Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: dts: rockchip: correct regulator power states for suspend

2015-08-24 Thread Heiko Stuebner
Am Mittwoch, 19. August 2015, 15:18:41 schrieb Brian Norris: > When getting translated from a downstream device tree that used slightly > different DT bindings, these regulators got labeled with the > "on-in-suspend" state, when they were actually supposed to be turned off > for S3 suspend. This wa

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: dts: rockchip: correct regulator power states for suspend

2015-08-19 Thread Javier Martinez Canillas
Hello Brian, On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 12:18 AM, Brian Norris wrote: > When getting translated from a downstream device tree that used slightly > different DT bindings, these regulators got labeled with the > "on-in-suspend" state, when they were actually supposed to be turned off > for S3 suspend.

[PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: dts: rockchip: correct regulator power states for suspend

2015-08-19 Thread Brian Norris
When getting translated from a downstream device tree that used slightly different DT bindings, these regulators got labeled with the "on-in-suspend" state, when they were actually supposed to be turned off for S3 suspend. This was harmless, but not intentional, AFAICT. Let's turn them off to get