Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] arm: twr-k70f120m: extend Freescale eDMA driver with the ability to support Kinetis SoC

2015-07-05 Thread Paul Osmialowski
Hi Vinod, You're right, this should be separate patchset. Having patchset too big leads to huge list of maintainers and lack of focusing on details (on-error return values are total mess now!). I plan to split it into three: 1) initial support (so the proof that platform is living could be read

Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] arm: twr-k70f120m: extend Freescale eDMA driver with the ability to support Kinetis SoC

2015-07-05 Thread Vinod Koul
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 02:27:27PM +0200, Paul Osmialowski wrote: The patch title is not per subsystem semantics, pls fix that > Surprisingly small amount of work was required in order to extend already > existing eDMA driver with the support for Kinetis SoC architecture. And this doesn't tell me

[PATCH v2 6/9] arm: twr-k70f120m: extend Freescale eDMA driver with the ability to support Kinetis SoC

2015-06-30 Thread Paul Osmialowski
Surprisingly small amount of work was required in order to extend already existing eDMA driver with the support for Kinetis SoC architecture. Signed-off-by: Paul Osmialowski --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/fsl-edma.txt | 38 ++- drivers/dma/fsl-edma.c |