Hi Vinod,
You're right, this should be separate patchset. Having patchset too big
leads to huge list of maintainers and lack of focusing on details
(on-error return values are total mess now!).
I plan to split it into three: 1) initial support (so the proof that
platform is living could be read
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 02:27:27PM +0200, Paul Osmialowski wrote:
The patch title is not per subsystem semantics, pls fix that
> Surprisingly small amount of work was required in order to extend already
> existing eDMA driver with the support for Kinetis SoC architecture.
And this doesn't tell me
Surprisingly small amount of work was required in order to extend already
existing eDMA driver with the support for Kinetis SoC architecture.
Signed-off-by: Paul Osmialowski
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/fsl-edma.txt | 38 ++-
drivers/dma/fsl-edma.c |