On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Romain Perier romain.per...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-11-11 16:01 GMT+01:00 Grant Likely grant.lik...@linaro.org:
So, to be a little pendantic, the 'ti,' prefix is basically just for
backwards compatibility with the old binding, and that old binding is
only used on
On Thu, 6 Nov 2014 14:23:02 +
, Romain Perier romain.per...@gmail.com
wrote:
It reverts commit a4b4e0461ec5 (of: Add standard property for poweroff
capability).
As discussed on the mailing list, it makes more sense to rename back to the
old established property name, without the vendor
2014-11-11 16:01 GMT+01:00 Grant Likely grant.lik...@linaro.org:
So, to be a little pendantic, the 'ti,' prefix is basically just for
backwards compatibility with the old binding, and that old binding is
only used on palmas.c, tps65*.c and twl4030-power.c, correct?
No, the backward
It reverts commit a4b4e0461ec5 (of: Add standard property for poweroff
capability).
As discussed on the mailing list, it makes more sense to rename back to the
old established property name, without the vendor prefix. Problem being that
the word source usually tends to be used for inputs and that