On 06/01/2015 12:31 AM, Barry Song wrote:
2015-05-29 23:50 GMT+08:00 Bjorn Andersson bj...@kryo.se:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com wrote:
[..]
reg = 0x1324 0x0001;
An unrelated question here, why the reg is same for all the
On 06/01/2015 12:33 AM, Barry Song wrote:
2015-05-29 5:30 GMT+08:00 Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com:
Barry,
On 05/26/2015 03:28 AM, Barry Song wrote:
From: Wei Chen wei.c...@csr.com
This patch moves to use generic dt-binding for hwspinlock providers and
clients.
add #hwlock-cells for the
2015-05-29 23:50 GMT+08:00 Bjorn Andersson bj...@kryo.se:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com wrote:
[..]
reg = 0x1324 0x0001;
An unrelated question here, why the reg is same for all the child nodes
of the parent ipc node? If this
2015-05-29 5:30 GMT+08:00 Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com:
Barry,
On 05/26/2015 03:28 AM, Barry Song wrote:
From: Wei Chen wei.c...@csr.com
This patch moves to use generic dt-binding for hwspinlock providers and
clients.
add #hwlock-cells for the provider and hwlocks for clients.
Cc: Suman Anna
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com wrote:
[..]
reg = 0x1324 0x0001;
An unrelated question here, why the reg is same for all the child nodes
of the parent ipc node? If this is partitioned properly, then the
driver can be simplified
Barry,
On 05/26/2015 03:28 AM, Barry Song wrote:
From: Wei Chen wei.c...@csr.com
This patch moves to use generic dt-binding for hwspinlock providers and
clients.
add #hwlock-cells for the provider and hwlocks for clients.
Cc: Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com
Cc: Bjorn Andersson bj...@kryo.se
From: Wei Chen wei.c...@csr.com
This patch moves to use generic dt-binding for hwspinlock providers and
clients.
add #hwlock-cells for the provider and hwlocks for clients.
Cc: Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com
Cc: Bjorn Andersson bj...@kryo.se
Signed-off-by: Wei Chen wei.c...@csr.com
Signed-off-by:
