; robh...@kernel.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] can: xilinx CAN controller support.
On 02/26/2014 03:46 PM, Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao wrote:
Hi
...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] can: xilinx CAN controller support.
On 02/28/2014 06:50 AM, Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao wrote:
Hi Marc,
-Original Message-
From: Marc Kleine-Budde
...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] can: xilinx CAN controller support.
On 02/28/2014 01:44 PM, Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao wrote:
Hi Marc,
-Original Message-
From: Marc Kleine-Budde
On 02/28/2014 02:07 PM, Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao wrote:
What happens if the interrupt handler is delayed? For example in a RT
enabled system the interrupt handler runs as a thread. There might be
other threads with higher priority. The hardware will probably send
all CAN frames in the
; linux-...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] can: xilinx CAN controller support.
On 02/28/2014 02:07 PM, Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao wrote:
What happens
...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] can: xilinx CAN controller support.
On 02/28/2014 02:07 PM, Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao wrote:
What happens if the interrupt handler is delayed? For example in a
RT
...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] can: xilinx CAN controller support.
On 02/26/2014 03:46 PM, Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao wrote:
Hi Marc,
-Original Message-
From: Marc Kleine-Budde
On 02/26/2014 02:07 PM, Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao wrote:
This loop looks broken. Can you explain how it works.
What it shoud do is:
We have put (priv-tx_head - priv-tx_tail) CAN frames into the FIFO.
This means at maximum there could be this amount of CAN frames which
have been
...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] can: xilinx CAN controller support.
On 02/26/2014 02:07 PM, Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao wrote:
This loop looks broken. Can you explain how it works.
What
On 02/24/2014 05:25 AM, Kedareswara rao Appana wrote:
This patch adds xilinx CAN controller support.
This driver supports both ZYNQ CANPS and Soft IP
AXI CAN controller.
Signed-off-by: Kedareswara rao Appana appa...@xilinx.com
Looks quite good. Just the tx_complete routine is a bit fishy.
This patch adds xilinx CAN controller support.
This driver supports both ZYNQ CANPS and Soft IP
AXI CAN controller.
Signed-off-by: Kedareswara rao Appana appa...@xilinx.com
---
This patch is rebased on the 3.14 rc4 kernel.
Changes for v4:
- Added check for the tx fifo full interrupt condition in
11 matches
Mail list logo