Hi Thierry,
Would you apply the patches? Or, should I modify them more?
Hi Simon,
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 10:07 AM
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 06:08:42PM +0900, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
This patch set is based on the linux-pwm.git / for-next branch.
(commit id =
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 06:08:42PM +0900, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
This patch set is based on the linux-pwm.git / for-next branch.
(commit id = 361c1066c939a88e3bb59364f47055b2a5fb3fd4)
Both patches:
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman horms+rene...@verge.net.au
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
This patch set is based on the linux-pwm.git / for-next branch.
(commit id = 361c1066c939a88e3bb59364f47055b2a5fb3fd4)
Changes from v4:
- Clean up coding style and typo in patch 2.
- Change to_rcar_pwm_chip() macro to static inline function in patch 2.
- Use writel()/readl() instead of