Re: [PATCH v5 3/9] at91: pinctrl: don't request GPIOs used for interrupts but lock them as IRQ

Hi Boris, Sorry for being late, I was on vacation. Yes this patch can be dropped from the serie. 2014-03-12 13:59 GMT+01:00 Boris BREZILLON b.brezillon@gmail.com: Hi JJ, IIRC this patch was necessary for the DM9000 device, which is not defined in this series anymore. And, correct me if

Re: [PATCH v5 3/9] at91: pinctrl: don't request GPIOs used for interrupts but lock them as IRQ

Le 17/03/2014 12:14, Jean-Jacques Hiblot a écrit : Hi Boris, Sorry for being late, I was on vacation. Yes this patch can be dropped from the serie. That's fine, Nicolas dropped it ;-). 2014-03-12 13:59 GMT+01:00 Boris BREZILLON b.brezillon@gmail.com: Hi JJ, IIRC this patch was

Re: [PATCH v5 3/9] at91: pinctrl: don't request GPIOs used for interrupts but lock them as IRQ

Hi JJ, IIRC this patch was necessary for the DM9000 device, which is not defined in this series anymore. And, correct me if I'm wrong, but there's still a discussion about how this should be fixed properly (https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/25/388). As a result, shouldn't we remove this patch from

[PATCH v5 3/9] at91: pinctrl: don't request GPIOs used for interrupts but lock them as IRQ

During the xlate stage of the DT interrupt parsing, the at91 pinctrl driver requests the GPIOs that are described as interrupt sources. This prevents a driver to request the gpio later to get its electrical value. This patch replaces the gpio_request with a gpio_lock_as_irq to prevent the gpio to