On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 05:59:20PM +0100, Tomasz Figa wrote:
[...]
> About the patch 8 alone, somebody would have to test it. Maybe Bart or
> Krzysztof could find some time to look at this? Other than that, I'm not
> quite sure about entry latency you specified. It would look like
> entering the
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 02:42:48PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sunday, September 14, 2014 06:59:20 PM Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > [dropping my old @samsung.com address]
> >
> > On 11.09.2014 10:57, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 09:28:06AM +0100, Dan
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 02:35:14PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Friday, September 12, 2014 12:26:43 PM Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:32:57AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > Daniel, Lorenzo,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:32:48AM +01
Hi,
On Sunday, September 14, 2014 06:59:20 PM Tomasz Figa wrote:
> [dropping my old @samsung.com address]
>
> On 11.09.2014 10:57, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 09:28:06AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> On 09/05/2014 05:34 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Sep
Hi,
On Friday, September 12, 2014 12:26:43 PM Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:32:57AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > Daniel, Lorenzo,
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:32:48AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > > On 09/11/2014 10:57 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > > Th
[dropping my old @samsung.com address]
On 11.09.2014 10:57, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 09:28:06AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 09/05/2014 05:34 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 10:21:20AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 0
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:32:57AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Daniel, Lorenzo,
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:32:48AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > On 09/11/2014 10:57 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > There is no ARM code in my series. So to sum it up:
> > >
> > > a) I send a pull reques
Daniel, Lorenzo,
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:32:48AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 09/11/2014 10:57 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > There is no ARM code in my series. So to sum it up:
> >
> > a) I send a pull request to Catalin for arm64 patches on top of the branch
> > you are creating wi
On 09/11/2014 10:57 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 09:28:06AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 09/05/2014 05:34 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 10:21:20AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 06:29:10PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
On
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 09:28:06AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 09/05/2014 05:34 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 10:21:20AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 06:29:10PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 05:03:20PM +0100,
On 09/05/2014 05:34 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 10:21:20AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 06:29:10PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 05:03:20PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 06:37:40PM +0100, Lorenzo Pi
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 10:21:20AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 06:29:10PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 05:03:20PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 06:37:40PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > > This patch should b
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 06:29:10PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 05:03:20PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 06:37:40PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > This patch should be ready to go too, is it ok if I split the series
> > > in arm64 arch
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 05:03:20PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 06:37:40PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 04:28:42PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > > This patch implements a generic CPU idle driver for ARM64 machines.
> > >
> > > It reli
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 06:37:40PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 04:28:42PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > This patch implements a generic CPU idle driver for ARM64 machines.
> >
> > It relies on the DT idle states infrastructure to initialize idle
> > states count
Hi Daniel,
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 04:28:42PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> This patch implements a generic CPU idle driver for ARM64 machines.
>
> It relies on the DT idle states infrastructure to initialize idle
> states count and respective parameters. Current code assumes the driver
> is
This patch implements a generic CPU idle driver for ARM64 machines.
It relies on the DT idle states infrastructure to initialize idle
states count and respective parameters. Current code assumes the driver
is managing idle states on all possible CPUs but can be easily
generalized to support hetero
17 matches
Mail list logo