On 11/19/2014 06:43 PM, Lina Iyer wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14 2014 at 08:56 -0700, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 10/25/2014 01:40 AM, Lina Iyer wrote:
+/**
+ * spm_set_low_power_mode() - Configure SPM start address for low
power mode
+ * @mode: SPM LPM mode to enter
+ */
+int
On Wed, Nov 26 2014 at 04:19 -0700, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 11/19/2014 06:43 PM, Lina Iyer wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14 2014 at 08:56 -0700, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 10/25/2014 01:40 AM, Lina Iyer wrote:
+
+if ((cpu -1) !cpuidle_drv_init) {
+
On Wed, Nov 26 2014 at 08:20 -0700, Lina Iyer wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26 2014 at 04:19 -0700, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 11/19/2014 06:43 PM, Lina Iyer wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14 2014 at 08:56 -0700, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 10/25/2014 01:40 AM, Lina Iyer wrote:
+
+if ((cpu -1)
Oops, I thought I had sent this, but it was sitting in the drafts
folder. Sending anyways because it looks like most of these issues
still exist in v10.
Lina Iyer lina.i...@linaro.org writes:
SPM is a hardware block that controls the peripheral logic surrounding
the application cores
On 11/26/2014 07:04 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Oops, I thought I had sent this, but it was sitting in the drafts
folder. Sending anyways because it looks like most of these issues
still exist in v10.
[ ... ]
+* On some SoC's if the control registers are written first and if the
+
On Fri, Nov 14 2014 at 08:56 -0700, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 10/25/2014 01:40 AM, Lina Iyer wrote:
+/**
+ * spm_set_low_power_mode() - Configure SPM start address for low power mode
+ * @mode: SPM LPM mode to enter
+ */
+int qcom_spm_set_low_power_mode(enum pm_sleep_mode mode)
+{
+
On Fri, Nov 14 2014 at 15:46 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 10/24, Lina Iyer wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..ee2e3ca
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c
+#include linux/module.h
+#include linux/kernel.h
+#include
On Mon, Nov 17 2014 at 14:32 -0700, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 10/25/2014 01:40 AM, Lina Iyer wrote:
Hi Lina,
[ ... ]
+static inline void spm_register_write(struct spm_driver_data *drv,
+ enum spm_reg reg, u32 val)
+{
+ if
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Daniel Lezcano
daniel.lezc...@linaro.org wrote:
On 10/25/2014 01:40 AM, Lina Iyer wrote:
Hi Lina,
[ ... ]
+static inline void spm_register_write(struct spm_driver_data *drv,
+ enum spm_reg reg, u32 val)
+{
+ if
On 11/18/2014 08:56 AM, Lina Iyer wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14 2014 at 15:46 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 10/24, Lina Iyer wrote:
+{
+struct spm_driver_data *drv = this_cpu_ptr(cpu_spm_drv);
+u32 start_index;
+u32 ctl_val;
+
+if (!drv-available)
+return -ENXIO;
It
On 10/25/2014 01:40 AM, Lina Iyer wrote:
Hi Lina,
[ ... ]
+static inline void spm_register_write(struct spm_driver_data *drv,
+ enum spm_reg reg, u32 val)
+{
+ if (drv-reg_data-reg_offset[reg])
+ writel_relaxed(val, drv-reg_base +
+
On 10/25/2014 01:40 AM, Lina Iyer wrote:
SPM is a hardware block that controls the peripheral logic surrounding
the application cores (cpu/l$). When the core executes WFI instruction,
the SPM takes over the putting the core in low power state as
configured. The wake up for the SPM is an
On 10/24, Lina Iyer wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..ee2e3ca
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c
+#include linux/module.h
+#include linux/kernel.h
+#include linux/delay.h
Is this used?
+#include linux/init.h
13 matches
Mail list logo
