On Tue, 4 Mar 2014 11:58:22 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni
wrote:
> The existing fixed_phy_add() function has several drawbacks that
> prevents it from being used as is for OF-based declaration of fixed
> PHYs:
>
> * The address of the PHY on the fake bus needs to be passed, while a
>dynamic allo
2014-03-04 2:58 GMT-08:00 Thomas Petazzoni
:
> The existing fixed_phy_add() function has several drawbacks that
> prevents it from being used as is for OF-based declaration of fixed
> PHYs:
>
> * The address of the PHY on the fake bus needs to be passed, while a
>dynamic allocation is desired.
The existing fixed_phy_add() function has several drawbacks that
prevents it from being used as is for OF-based declaration of fixed
PHYs:
* The address of the PHY on the fake bus needs to be passed, while a
dynamic allocation is desired.
* Since the phy_device instantiation is post-poned un