Re: [PATCHv3 2/4] net: phy: extend fixed driver with fixed_phy_register()

2014-03-07 Thread Grant Likely
On Tue, 4 Mar 2014 11:58:22 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > The existing fixed_phy_add() function has several drawbacks that > prevents it from being used as is for OF-based declaration of fixed > PHYs: > > * The address of the PHY on the fake bus needs to be passed, while a >dynamic allo

Re: [PATCHv3 2/4] net: phy: extend fixed driver with fixed_phy_register()

2014-03-04 Thread Florian Fainelli
2014-03-04 2:58 GMT-08:00 Thomas Petazzoni : > The existing fixed_phy_add() function has several drawbacks that > prevents it from being used as is for OF-based declaration of fixed > PHYs: > > * The address of the PHY on the fake bus needs to be passed, while a >dynamic allocation is desired.

[PATCHv3 2/4] net: phy: extend fixed driver with fixed_phy_register()

2014-03-04 Thread Thomas Petazzoni
The existing fixed_phy_add() function has several drawbacks that prevents it from being used as is for OF-based declaration of fixed PHYs: * The address of the PHY on the fake bus needs to be passed, while a dynamic allocation is desired. * Since the phy_device instantiation is post-poned un