On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 04:39:54PM +0900, Gyungoh Yoo wrote:
If of_match and regulators_node are assigned, don't I need to
call of_regulator_match()? Does regulator_register() call it internally?
So can I write code like below?
static const struct regulator_desc sky81452_reg = {
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 02:18:36PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 05:33:08PM +0900, gyun...@gmail.com wrote:
np = of_get_child_by_name(dev-parent-of_node, regulator);
+ ret = of_regulator_match(dev, np, sky81452_match, 1);
Don't open code this, use
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 05:04:51PM +0900, Gyungoh Yoo wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 02:18:36PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
Don't open code this, use regulators_node and of_match as previously
advised.
I think I had a misunderstanding.
But I have no idea about regulators_node and of_match.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:20:56AM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 05:04:51PM +0900, Gyungoh Yoo wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 02:18:36PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
Don't open code this, use regulators_node and of_match as previously
advised.
I think I had a
From: Gyungoh Yoo jack@skyworksinc.com
Signed-off-by: Gyungoh Yoo jack@skyworksinc.com
---
Changes v7:
Modified licensing text to GPLv2
Splitted Kconfig renaming from DT patch
Changes v6:
Added new line character at the end of line of dev_err()
Changes v5:
Changed DT for regulator :
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 05:33:08PM +0900, gyun...@gmail.com wrote:
np = of_get_child_by_name(dev-parent-of_node, regulator);
+ ret = of_regulator_match(dev, np, sky81452_match, 1);
Don't open code this, use regulators_node and of_match as previously
advised.
signature.asc
