Hello.
> Here's my proposal, based in Pekon's latest work.
>
> This patch removes the flash device bus-width configuration, prior to
> the device detection. With this modification, a NAND driver is no longer
> able to "force" the device width, and instead can only obtain the detected
> bus-width
Hi Brian,
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 12:35:37AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> Hi Ezequiel,
>
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:40:55AM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > Here's my proposal, based in Pekon's latest work.
> >
> > This patch removes the flash device bus-width configuration, prior to
> > the
Hi Brian, Ezequiel,
Sorry Im bit confused on below, so few queries ..
>From: Brian Norris [computersforpe...@gmail.com]
>So I think the problem may need to be divided into 2 parts:
>
>1) How do we best handle ONFI transactions, so that they are always
> performed on the lower 8 bits of the bus *
Hello.
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:40:55AM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > Here's my proposal, based in Pekon's latest work.
> >
> > This patch removes the flash device bus-width configuration, prior to
> > the device detection. With this modification, a NAND driver is no longer
> > able to "f
Hi Ezequiel,
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:40:55AM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> Here's my proposal, based in Pekon's latest work.
>
> This patch removes the flash device bus-width configuration, prior to
> the device detection. With this modification, a NAND driver is no longer
> able to "force"
Here's my proposal, based in Pekon's latest work.
This patch removes the flash device bus-width configuration, prior to
the device detection. With this modification, a NAND driver is no longer
able to "force" the device width, and instead can only obtain the detected
bus-width after the call to na
