Re: [RFC 1/3] i2c: document binding for multi-master case

2015-12-18 Thread Rob Herring
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 07:44:18PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > From: Wolfram Sang > > We need this binding because some I2C master drivers will need to adapt > their PM settings for the arbitration circuitry. I skipped the "i2c-" > prefix because I can imagine

[RFC 1/3] i2c: document binding for multi-master case

2015-12-16 Thread Wolfram Sang
From: Wolfram Sang We need this binding because some I2C master drivers will need to adapt their PM settings for the arbitration circuitry. I skipped the "i2c-" prefix because I can imagine to be useful outside of i2c. Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang