One more thing:
@@ -883,7 +894,11 @@ static inline const struct cci_pmu_model
*get_cci_model(struct platform_device *
pdev-dev.of_node);
if (!match)
return NULL;
+ if (match-data)
+ return
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 09:51:41AM +, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
From: Suzuki K. Poulose suzuki.poul...@arm.com
A minor change, fixed missplled 'DEPRECATED' in the dev_warn().
Thanks
Suzuki
8
Avoid secure transactions while probing the CCI PMU. The
existing code makes use of
On 19/03/15 17:38, Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 19/03/15 17:32, Mark Rutland wrote:
One more thing:
@@ -883,7 +894,11 @@ static inline const struct cci_pmu_model
*get_cci_model(struct platform_device *
pdev-dev.of_node);
if (!match)
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 05:52:54PM +, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
On 19/03/15 17:38, Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 19/03/15 17:32, Mark Rutland wrote:
One more thing:
@@ -883,7 +894,11 @@ static inline const struct cci_pmu_model
*get_cci_model(struct platform_device *
On 19/03/15 17:32, Mark Rutland wrote:
One more thing:
@@ -883,7 +894,11 @@ static inline const struct cci_pmu_model
*get_cci_model(struct platform_device *
pdev-dev.of_node);
if (!match)
return NULL;
+ if
From: Suzuki K. Poulose suzuki.poul...@arm.com
A minor change, fixed missplled 'DEPRECATED' in the dev_warn().
Thanks
Suzuki
8
Avoid secure transactions while probing the CCI PMU. The
existing code makes use of the Peripheral ID2 (PID2) register
to determine the revision of the CCI400,
