Experts,
I am looking for guidelines to name a DT property in a bindings. Do we
need to add a vendor specific prefix always or is it needed only
specific cases? I know the intent here is to avoid name space collision.
But by name space I assume, within a specific a device binding. For
example where device driver has a core framework that also uses DT
properties, any low level device driver using the framework needs to add
a vendor specific prefix to avoid collision. Is my understanding
correct? So standalone device drivers doesn't have to use prefix? Right?
--
Murali Karicheri
Linux Kernel, Keystone
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
