Re: IIO device indexing issue

2015-11-09 Thread Markus Pargmann
On Saturday 07 November 2015 11:03:26 Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote: > On 06/11/15 11:49, Markus Pargmann wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thursday, November 05, 2015 07:13:41 PM Jonathan Cameron wrote: > >> On 04/11/15 18:53, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote: > >>> To continue from this "label" property idea I was

Re: IIO device indexing issue

2015-11-07 Thread Vesa Jääskeläinen
On 06/11/15 11:49, Markus Pargmann wrote: Hi, On Thursday, November 05, 2015 07:13:41 PM Jonathan Cameron wrote: On 04/11/15 18:53, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote: To continue from this "label" property idea I was wondering if we would add it as new optional(?) file node for IIO devices.> One could

Re: IIO device indexing issue

2015-11-06 Thread Markus Pargmann
Hi, On Thursday, November 05, 2015 07:13:41 PM Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On 04/11/15 18:53, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote: > > To continue from this "label" property idea I was wondering if we > > would add it as new optional(?) file node for IIO devices.> > > One could then specify it like: > > > >

Re: IIO device indexing issue

2015-11-05 Thread Jonathan Cameron
On 04/11/15 18:53, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote: > On 04/11/15 11:38, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: >> On 11/02/2015 07:47 PM, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> When we were using kernel 3.2 and with that board files we just got IIO >>> devices with static order so that we knew exactly what

Re: IIO device indexing issue

2015-11-04 Thread Phil Reid
On 5/11/2015 2:53 AM, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote: On 04/11/15 11:38, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: On 11/02/2015 07:47 PM, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote: Hi, When we were using kernel 3.2 and with that board files we just got IIO devices with static order so that we knew exactly what iio:device0 is. Now

Re: IIO device indexing issue

2015-11-04 Thread Phil Reid
On 5/11/2015 9:25 AM, Phil Reid wrote: On 5/11/2015 2:53 AM, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote: On 04/11/15 11:38, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: On 11/02/2015 07:47 PM, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote: Hi, When we were using kernel 3.2 and with that board files we just got IIO devices with static order so that

Re: IIO device indexing issue

2015-11-04 Thread Vesa Jääskeläinen
On 04/11/15 11:38, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: On 11/02/2015 07:47 PM, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote: Hi, When we were using kernel 3.2 and with that board files we just got IIO devices with static order so that we knew exactly what iio:device0 is. Now with device tree that order is not so static

Re: IIO device indexing issue

2015-11-04 Thread Lars-Peter Clausen
On 11/02/2015 07:47 PM, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote: > Hi, > > When we were using kernel 3.2 and with that board files we just got IIO > devices with static order so that we knew exactly what iio:device0 is. > > Now with device tree that order is not so static anymore especially when > using device