On Saturday 07 November 2015 11:03:26 Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
> On 06/11/15 11:49, Markus Pargmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thursday, November 05, 2015 07:13:41 PM Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> >> On 04/11/15 18:53, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
> >>> To continue from this "label" property idea I was
On 06/11/15 11:49, Markus Pargmann wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday, November 05, 2015 07:13:41 PM Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On 04/11/15 18:53, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
To continue from this "label" property idea I was wondering if we
would add it as new optional(?) file node for IIO devices.>
One could
Hi,
On Thursday, November 05, 2015 07:13:41 PM Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 04/11/15 18:53, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
> > To continue from this "label" property idea I was wondering if we
> > would add it as new optional(?) file node for IIO devices.>
> > One could then specify it like:
> >
> >
On 04/11/15 18:53, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
> On 04/11/15 11:38, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> On 11/02/2015 07:47 PM, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> When we were using kernel 3.2 and with that board files we just got IIO
>>> devices with static order so that we knew exactly what
On 5/11/2015 2:53 AM, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
On 04/11/15 11:38, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
On 11/02/2015 07:47 PM, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
Hi,
When we were using kernel 3.2 and with that board files we just got IIO
devices with static order so that we knew exactly what iio:device0 is.
Now
On 5/11/2015 9:25 AM, Phil Reid wrote:
On 5/11/2015 2:53 AM, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
On 04/11/15 11:38, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
On 11/02/2015 07:47 PM, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
Hi,
When we were using kernel 3.2 and with that board files we just got
IIO
devices with static order so that
On 04/11/15 11:38, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
On 11/02/2015 07:47 PM, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
Hi,
When we were using kernel 3.2 and with that board files we just got IIO
devices with static order so that we knew exactly what iio:device0 is.
Now with device tree that order is not so static
On 11/02/2015 07:47 PM, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When we were using kernel 3.2 and with that board files we just got IIO
> devices with static order so that we knew exactly what iio:device0 is.
>
> Now with device tree that order is not so static anymore especially when
> using device