On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Yoder Stuart-B08248
wrote:
>> Mediawiki is as readable as any, and it's got the advantage of a
>> stable and well supported application behind it. I've used mediawiki
>> for a while now, and it's pretty much proven that it scales well, and
>> does a good job of han
> MediaWiki does support XML exporting for off-line editing (one of the
> reasons I chose mediawiki), so we could have a canned xml export of
> approved bindings into a git repo somewhere. Being able to generate
> an off-line copy is something I think is important.
If there are ways to export th
