> -Original Message-
> From: David VomLehn [mailto:dvoml...@cisco.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 3:41 PM
> To: Yoder Stuart-B08248
> Cc: dev...@dvomlehn-lnx2.corp.sa.net; t...@dvomlehn-lnx2.corp.sa.net;
> mail...@dvomlehn-lnx2.corp.sa.net; l...@dvomlehn-lnx2.corp.sa.net;
> devicetr
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:32:46AM -0700, Yoder Stuart-B08248 wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: devicetree-discuss-
> > bounces+stuart.yoder=freescale@lists.ozlabs.org
> [mailto:devicetree-
> > discuss-bounces+stuart.yoder=freescale@lists.ozlabs.org] On Behalf
> Of
> > D
> The device tree should represent your hardware as it is. If these
> devices sit on some bus, then you should probably represent the
> bus, with the devices as subnodes. Don't create logical container
> nodes unless they are warranted for some good reason.
More importantly: no device tree clie
> -Original Message-
> From: devicetree-discuss-
> bounces+stuart.yoder=freescale@lists.ozlabs.org
[mailto:devicetree-
> discuss-bounces+stuart.yoder=freescale@lists.ozlabs.org] On Behalf
Of
> David VomLehn
> Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 4:45 PM
> To: dev...@dvomlehn-lnx2.corp.s
