Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86: OLPC: speed up device tree creation during boot (v2)

* Ingo Molnar wrote: > > However, I have to vehemently object to putting them in a wider scope > > than is otherwise necessary. I agree that static variables should be > > used sparsely if at all (there really are vary few uses of them that are > > valid), but putting them in a larger scope scr

Re: [RFC] MPIC Bindings and Bindings for AMP Systems

On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:51:29AM -0600, Meador Inge wrote: > Hi All, > > I am currently doing some work on Linux PPC AMP systems (with Hollis, > CC'd). We are using device trees to partition resources between the > different OSes. To help with this effort, we would like to introduce > some new

Re: [PATCH 1/4] of: Add support for linking device tree blobs into vmlinux

On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:57:26AM -0800, dirk.brande...@gmail.com wrote: > From: Dirk Brandewie > > This patch adds support for linking device tree blob(s) into > vmlinux. Modifies asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h to add linking > .dtb sections into vmlinux. To maintain compatiblity with the of/fdt > d

Re: [PATCH 1/4] of: Add support for linking device tree blobs into vmlinux

On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 07:14:20AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > 2010/12/22 Michal Marek : > > On 22.12.2010 20:57, dirk.brande...@gmail.com wrote: > >> > >> From: Dirk Brandewie > >> > >> This patch adds support for linking device tree blob(s) into > >> vmlinux. Modifies asm-generic/vmlinux.l

Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86/of: Add building device tree blob(s) into image.

On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:57:27AM -0800, dirk.brande...@gmail.com wrote: > From: Dirk Brandewie > > This patch adds linking device tree blob into vmlinux. DTB's are > added by adding the blob object name to list of objects to be linked > into the image. > > Signed-off-by: Dirk Brandewie > ---

Re: [PATCH 4/4] microblaze/of: Use generic rule to build dtb's

On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:57:29AM -0800, dirk.brande...@gmail.com wrote: > From: Dirk Brandewie > > Modify arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile to use dtc command in > scripts/Makefile.lib > > Signed-off-by: Dirk Brandewie applied, thanks g. > --- > arch/microblaze/boot/Makefile | 12 +++-

Re: [PATCH 3/4] of/powerpc: Use generic rule to build dtb's

On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:57:28AM -0800, dirk.brande...@gmail.com wrote: > From: Dirk Brandewie > > Modify arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile to use dtc command in > scripts/Makefile.lib > > Signed-off-by: Dirk Brandewie applied, thanks g. > --- > arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile |8 +++- > 1 fi

Re: [RFC] MPIC Bindings and Bindings for AMP Systems

On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 03:49:54PM -0600, Meador Inge wrote: > On 12/23/2010 12:56 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > >Hi Meador. Comments below. > > > >g. > > Thanks a lot for the feedback Grant. > > >You should probably list them here anyway to aid the reader. > > Will do. > > >What is the use case f

[PATCH] fix hang in dmfe driver on sending of big packet (linux-2.6.35)

Hello! This patch fixes hang in dmfe driver on attempt of sending a big packet. Without this patch the code stops the queue and never wakes it again. Signed-off-by: Alexander V. Lukyanov -- Alexander. --- dmfe.c.12010-11-30 16:21:52.758465207 +0300 +++ dmfe.c 2010-11-30 16:24:45.30

Re: i2c-ocores changes (version 2)

On 24/11/10 16:26, Jonas Bonn wrote: > Version 2 of patch series incorporating initial feedback from review. > > /Jonas I'm relatively happy with this. Any comments from the devicetree side? ___ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.o

Re: [PATCH 1/2] video, sm501: add OF binding to support SM501

On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 09:23:47AM +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote: > - add binding to OF, compatible name "smi,sm501" > > - add read/write functions for using this driver > also on powerpc plattforms > > - add commandline options: > sm501.fb_mode: > Specify resolution as "x[-][@]" > sm501.

Re: [PATCH 1/2] video, sm501: add OF binding to support SM501

Hi Heiko, On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 07:49:45AM +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote: > Hello Paul, > > Paul Mundt wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 09:23:47AM +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote: > >> - add binding to OF, compatible name "smi,sm501" > >> > [...] > >> Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt |

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] video, sm501: add OF binding to support SM501

On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 07:31:15 +0100 Heiko Schocher wrote: > - add commandline options: > sm501.fb_mode: sm501.mode: > Specify resolution as "x[-][@]" > sm501.bpp: > Specify bit-per-pixel if not specified mode > > --- > > Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt |7 + >

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] video, sm501: add OF binding to support SM501

On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 07:31:15 +0100 Heiko Schocher wrote: > - add commandline options: > sm501.fb_mode: sm501.mode: > Specify resolution as "x[-][@]" > sm501.bpp: > Specify bit-per-pixel if not specified mode > > --- > > Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt |7 + >

Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86/of: Add building device tree blob(s) into image.

On 8.12.2010 16:01, dirk.brande...@gmail.com wrote: > From: Dirk Brandewie > > This patch adds linking device tree blob into vmlinux. DTB's are > added by adding the blob object name to list of objects to be linked > into the image. > > Signed-off-by: Dirk Brandewie > --- > arch/x86/platform/c

Re: [PATCH 1/4] of: Add support for linking device tree blobs into vmlinux

On 8.12.2010 16:01, dirk.brande...@gmail.com wrote: > +quiet_cmd_dt_S_dtb= DTB$@ > +quiet_cmd_dtc = DTC $@ Hi, just an aesthetic remark: The target name should start at the 9th column, so there should be 5 spaces after both "DTB" and "DTC". Michal ___

Re: [PATCH 1/4] of: Add support for linking device tree blobs into vmlinux

On 22.12.2010 20:57, dirk.brande...@gmail.com wrote: From: Dirk Brandewie This patch adds support for linking device tree blob(s) into vmlinux. Modifies asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h to add linking .dtb sections into vmlinux. To maintain compatiblity with the of/fdt driver code platforms MUST copy t

[RFC] MPIC Bindings and Bindings for AMP Systems

Hi All, I am currently doing some work on Linux PPC AMP systems (with Hollis, CC'd). We are using device trees to partition resources between the different OSes. To help with this effort, we would like to introduce some new bindings to the MPIC. Currently, there are no bindings for the MPIC un

[RFC] MPIC Bindings and Bindings for AMP Systems

Hi All, I am currently doing some work on Linux PPC AMP systems (with Hollis, CC'd). We are using device trees to partition resources between the different OSes. To help with this effort, we would like to introduce some new bindings to the MPIC. Currently, there are no bindings for the MPIC un

Re: [RFC] MPIC Bindings and Bindings for AMP Systems

On 12/23/2010 12:56 PM, Grant Likely wrote: Hi Meador. Comments below. g. Thanks a lot for the feedback Grant. You should probably list them here anyway to aid the reader. Will do. What is the use case for the protected-sources property? Wouldn't the irqs simply not be referenced by an

Re: [PATCH 3/3] i2c-ocores: add some device tree documentation

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 05:26:22PM +0100, Jonas Bonn wrote: > This puts some documentation for the device tree configuration at the head > of the driver file. Hopefully this can get moved to a common area for this > type of documentation at a later date; unfortunately, there isn't really > such a

Re: i2c-ocores changes (version 2)

On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 04:33:46AM +, Ben Dooks wrote: > On 24/11/10 16:26, Jonas Bonn wrote: > > Version 2 of patch series incorporating initial feedback from review. > > > > /Jonas > > I'm relatively happy with this. > Any comments from the devicetree side? Patches 1 & 2 look good to me.