On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:58:13 +
> Yoder Stuart-B08248 wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Meador Inge [mailto:mead...@gmail.com]
>> > Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 9:26 PM
>> > To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
>> > Cc: Y
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:58:13 +
Yoder Stuart-B08248 wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Meador Inge [mailto:mead...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 9:26 PM
> > To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> > Cc: Yoder Stuart-B08248; devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org; linuxp
On 02/11/2011 08:58 AM, Yoder Stuart-B08248 wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Meador Inge [mailto:mead...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 9:26 PM
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Cc: Yoder Stuart-B08248; devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org; linuxppc-
d...@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> On 02/10/2011 09:29 PM, Thomas Abraham wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am currently adding device tree support for Samsung's S5PV310
>> processor. I have a question about handling platform_data when adding
>> device tree support in drivers
Thomas,
On 02/10/2011 09:29 PM, Thomas Abraham wrote:
Hi,
I am currently adding device tree support for Samsung's S5PV310
processor. I have a question about handling platform_data when adding
device tree support in drivers, specifically about the sdhci-s3c
driver.
The platform data that is pas
> -Original Message-
> From: Meador Inge [mailto:mead...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 9:26 PM
> To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> Cc: Yoder Stuart-B08248; devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org; linuxppc-
> d...@lists.ozlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] powerpc: Open PIC bi
Hi Grant,
On 1 February 2011 03:31, Grant Likely wrote:
> This patch implements an alternate method for using device tree data
> for populating machine device registration. Traditionally, board
> support has directly generated and registered devices based on nodes
> in the device tree. The boar