Hi,
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:41:28AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > > Jon, how do you feel about cutting a release?
> > >
> > > Happy to do so. I'll try to pull one together in the next couple
> > > days or so.
> >
> > Thanks, I appreciate it. I've been using the current tip for quite a
> > w
Adding OF binding to genirq.
Version string is setup to the "devicetree".
Compatible string is not setup for now but you can add your
custom compatible string to uio_of_genirq_match structure.
For example with "vendor,device" compatible string:
static const struct of_device_id __devinitconst uio_
Hans J. Koch wrote:
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 03:21:55PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
Hans J. Koch wrote:
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 10:34:12PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 08:51:55AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
Adding OF binding to genirq.
Version string is setup to the "device
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 09:59 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
>
> Heh, I wondered about that, but there hasn't been any users for at
> least 5 years (as evidenced by commit e12514650b, "Fix loop logic in
> irq_alloc_virt()") so it was looking pretty dead, and it made the
> patch to switch to using irq_al
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 10:05 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > I think you are going the wrong way around.
> >
> > First thing first, is to make the irq domain / mapping API generic
> > without the OF bits.
> >
> > IE. move the IRQ domain generically, get rid of irq_map by putting
> the
> > domain pt
> I completely agree that irq domains are a generically useful feature
> for architectures, and it should be made available. I also completely
> agree that it is orthogonal to device tree translations, which in a
> large part is why I've structured this series and the new code the
> way I have.
>
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 03:21:55PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>> Hans J. Koch wrote:
>> >On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 10:34:12PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> >>On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 08:51:55AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>> >>>Adding OF binding to
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 03:21:55PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hans J. Koch wrote:
> >On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 10:34:12PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >>On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 08:51:55AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> >>>Adding OF binding to genirq.
> >>>Version string is setup to the "devicetree".
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 11:50:22AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 14:02 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > This patch creates a common implementation of irq_of_create_mapping()
> > and factors out the interrupt domain translation code from powerpc to
> > make it available
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 11:47:47AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 14:01 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > irq_alloc_virt() and irq_free_virt() aren't called anywhere but from
> > arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c, and they are only ever called with count=1.
> > This patch removes
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 11:43:19AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 14:01 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > A lot of this series ends up being fixups to powerpc code; but the 4th
> > patch is of importance to every architecture using CONFIG_OF (except
> > SPARC, which has i
On Wed, 4 May 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Nicolas Pitre [110429 12:11]:
> > I don't think the DT data is that huge, but that's a point in favor of
> > doing it in the zImage code. We'll just need to feed the total size of
> > the uncompressed kernel .bss section to zImage when compiling it.
Hans J. Koch wrote:
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 10:34:12PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 08:51:55AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
Adding OF binding to genirq.
Version string is setup to the "devicetree".
Compatible string is not setup for now but you can add your
custom compatibl
On Monday 02 May 2011, Michal Simek wrote:
> Adding OF binding to genirq.
> Version string is setup to the "devicetree".
>
> Compatible string is not setup for now but you can add your
> custom compatible string to uio_of_genirq_match structure.
>
> For example with "vendor,device" compatible str
* Tony Lindgren [110504 00:20]:
> * Nicolas Pitre [110429 12:11]:
> > >
> > > Err, no. Moving stuff around becomes quite expensive when the cache is
> > > not on. It's far better to work out where to place it first time around
> > > so its not in the way.
> >
> > I don't think the DT data is
* Nicolas Pitre [110429 12:11]:
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 09:16:39AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > >
> > > > If the compressed image is smaller than BSS, then we end up
> > > > having DT
16 matches
Mail list logo
