On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 06:45:07PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 30 March 2012, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > > +- cd-inverted: when present, polarity on the wp gpio line is inverted
> > > +- wp-inverted: when present, polarity on the wp gpio line is inverted
> > I'm not sure about those tw
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 04:30:21PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
...
> The best solution that I could come up with is to not pass the index into the
> of_pwm_request() function but rather forward the consumer name as passed into
> pwm_get(). The of_pwm_request() could use the "pwm-names" property to
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Implement pinctrl_ops dt_node_to_map() and dt_free_map(). These allow
> complete specification of the desired pinmux configuration using device
> tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren
> ---
> v2: Rebase on of_property_for_each_string() A
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 11:20:46PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 04:30:21PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
...
> > The "bad"
> > thing is that it'll make the "pwm-names" property mandatory if more than a
> > single PWM is requested.
> >
> You do not have to make it mandatory, but
On 3/31/2012 12:15 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> > diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/tegra-kbc.c
>> > b/drivers/input/keyboard/tegra-kbc.c
> ...
>> > #else
>> > -static inline struct tegra_kbc_platform_data *tegra_kbc_dt_parse_pdata(
>> > - struct platform_device *pdev)
>> > +static struct tegr
Hi Dmitry,
This is an incremental patch over patch
"Input: of_keymap: Introduce matrix_keypad_of_build_keymap()"
sent earlier by me. Please squash it to that patch while applying.
This contains last few changes suggested by Stephen on V4 of this patch.
---
drivers/input/keyboard/tegra-kbc.c |
On Sun, 2012-04-01 at 23:27 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Grant Likely writes:
>
> > This patch drops the powerpc-specific irq_map table and replaces it with
> > directly using the irq_alloc_desc()/irq_free_desc() interfaces for
> > allocating
> > and freeing irq_desc structures.
>
> This brea
* Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 11:20:46PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 04:30:21PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> ...
> > > The "bad"
> > > thing is that it'll make the "pwm-names" property mandatory if more than a
> > > single PWM is requested.
> > >
> > You do
Hi Stephen,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Define a new binding for the Tegra pin controller, which is capable of
> defining all aspects of desired pin multiplexing and pin configuration.
> This is all based on the new common pinctrl bindings.
>
> Add Tegra30 binding ba
