* Thierry Reding wrote:
> * Thierry Reding wrote:
> > The latest series for the PWM subsystem is here[0]. However that version
> > doesn't contain the latest changes that require this. I haven't pushed those
> > changes yet because they cause the build to fail (because of these two
> > missing patc
The libfdt read/write functions are now usable enough that it's become a
moderately common pattern to use them to build and manipulate a device
tree from scratch. For example, we do so ourself in our rw_tree1 testcase,
and qemu is starting to use this model when building device trees for some
targ
In device trees in the world, properties consisting of a single 64-bit
integer are not as common as those consisting of a single 32-bit, cell
sized integer, but they're common enough that they're worth including
convenience functions for.
This patch adds helper wrappers of fdt_setprop_inplace(), f
The testcases based on test_tree1_dts0.dts were added purely to test dtc's
backwards compatibility handling of the old dts-v0 format. Since that
support has been removed, the dts has been updated to use the current
dts-v1 syntax, which makes the testcases pass, but be completely useless.
This pat
This patch series adds some convenience functions to libfdt - all
trivial wrappers on existing functions. 1/3 is a preliminary cleanup
which removes some obsolete testcases, to avoid updating them for the
new code.
Please apply.
___
devicetree-discuss
On 31 May 2012 19:36, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:05:42AM +0800, Thomas Abraham wrote:
>> On 30 May 2012 18:13, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>> > No there isn't. You've got things like s3c64xx_device_spi0 in
>> > arch/arm/plat-samsung/devs.c (which you'd expect since the resources
>> >
Hi Haojian,
On Wed, May 30 2012, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> I tested non-DT boot on my brownstone board on TTC dkb board.
>
> It seems that you meet issue in icu_mux_irq_demux(). Could you give me
> the detail which interrupt is running while you meet the error?
>
> By the way, do you have the boot l
On 5/31/2012 4:55 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 05/31/2012 12:51 AM, Xiao Jiang wrote:
Hi Jon and Benoit,
Thanks for reminding, how about below patch?
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/omap-wdt.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/omap-wdt.txt
new file mode 100644
This commit adds support for passing a Flattened Device Tree (FDT) blob
to the Linux kernel.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding
---
com32/gfxboot/gfxboot.c |2 +-
com32/include/syslinux/linux.h | 25 +++-
com32/lib/Makefile |4 +++-
com32/lib/syslin
This patch series adds support for passing a Flattened Device Tree (FDT)
blob to the Linux kernel. Currently, only the linux.c32 module can do so
and some additional checking should be done to only pass the blob if the
kernel supports boot protocol 2.09 or later.
Thierry
Thierry Reding (2):
com
This new parameter can be used to specify a Flattened Device Tree (FDT)
blob to pass to the Linux kernel.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding
---
com32/modules/linux.c | 20 +++-
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/com32/modules/linux.c b/com32/modules/linux
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:05:42AM +0800, Thomas Abraham wrote:
> On 30 May 2012 18:13, Mark Brown wrote:
> > No there isn't. You've got things like s3c64xx_device_spi0 in
> > arch/arm/plat-samsung/devs.c (which you'd expect since the resources
> > that are passed in for memory mapping, DMA and
12 matches
Mail list logo
