On 10/26/2012 02:29 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren
>
> Modify cmd_dtc to run the C pre-processor on the input .dts file before
> passing it to dtc for final compilation. This allows the use of #define
> and #include within the .dts file.
While this change is small the implicati
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> This patch keeps all created pools in a global list and adds two
> functions that allow to retrieve the gen_pool pointer from a known
> physical address and from a device tree node.
So, I'm not seeing any added users of the of_get_named_gen
From: Stephen Warren
Modify cmd_dtc to run the C pre-processor on the input .dts file before
passing it to dtc for final compilation. This allows the use of #define
and #include within the .dts file.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren
---
v4:
* Use -x assembler-with-cpp so pre-defined macros are set
From: Stephen Warren
All architectures that use cmd_dtc do so in the same way. Move the build
rule to a central location to avoid duplication.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren
---
v4: No change.
v3: No change.
v2: New patch.
---
arch/arm/boot/Makefile |4
arch/c6x/boot/Makefile
* Benoit Cousson [121026 11:11]:
> On 10/26/2012 07:57 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > On 10/26/2012 07:54 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> >> On Fri, 26 Oct 2012, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 10/26/2012 05:16 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >>>
> I still can't get musb to work on
On 10/26/2012 07:57 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On 10/26/2012 07:54 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>> On Fri, 26 Oct 2012, Benoit Cousson wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/26/2012 05:16 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>>
I still can't get musb to work on 3.7-rc2. Apparently it is still
missing the pa
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> On 10/26/2012 05:16 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>
> > I still can't get musb to work on 3.7-rc2. Apparently it is still
> > missing the patches from Benoit's for_3.7/dts_part2.
> >
> > Maybe I just need to wait for it to be merged?
>
> They are now in a
Hi Paul,
On 10/26/2012 07:54 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2012, Benoit Cousson wrote:
>
>> On 10/26/2012 05:16 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>
>>> I still can't get musb to work on 3.7-rc2. Apparently it is still
>>> missing the patches from Benoit's for_3.7/dts_part2.
>>>
>>> Maybe I ju
* Haojian Zhuang [121025 18:49]:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Tony Lindgren [121022 10:11]:
> >> * Haojian Zhuang [121022 03:11]:
> >> > On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >> > > * Haojian Zhuang [121018 02:08]:
> >> > >> Add pinconf gener
* Benoit Cousson [121026 08:23]:
> Hi Roger,
>
> On 10/26/2012 05:16 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> > Hi Kishon & Benoit,
> >
> > On 09/24/2012 12:06 PM, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> >> 2012/9/24 ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY :
> >>> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 3:03 AM, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> USB doesn't work o
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> On some platforms the SRAM needs a clock to be enabled explicitly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel
> ---
> drivers/misc/sram.c | 10 ++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/sram.c b/drivers/misc/sram.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> This driver requests and remaps a memory region as configured in the
> device tree. It serves memory from this region via the genalloc API.
>
> Other drivers can retrieve the genalloc pool from a phandle pointing
> to this drivers' device no
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 09:20:36AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 09:59:01PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > I suspect that's not actually a big deal and that if we went down this
> > route we'd have the driver take over control from the core code during
> > probe() with the cor
Hi Roger,
On 10/26/2012 05:16 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Hi Kishon & Benoit,
>
> On 09/24/2012 12:06 PM, Rabin Vincent wrote:
>> 2012/9/24 ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY :
>>> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 3:03 AM, Rabin Vincent wrote:
USB doesn't work on pandaboard on linux-next, and bisection shows this
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> On some platforms the SRAM needs a clock to be enabled explicitly.
Since this is a file that you've just created in the previous commit,
I don't see why this needs to exist as a standalone commit, vs just
being folded back into the previous
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:36:14AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > What happens if the drivers get probed in the wrong order? That is, if
> > ehci-platform gets probed before ehci-spear (or whatever)?
>
> The "wrong" driver may get loaded.
T
This patch adds functions to handle parsing cpu affinity of interrupts
from devicetree. Devices using these functions are dealt with as
follows:
* If the device was not initialised from devicetree, it is considered to
be affine to all CPUs, and interrupts are assumed to be in order of
physical
Though of_parse_phandle handles lists of phandles, and takes an index
parameter, there is no standard way of discovering how many phandles are
present on a node. This patch adds a function to count how many phandles
are in a phandle list.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland
---
drivers/of/base.c | 39
Current devicetree bindings for devices which use cpu-affine shared interrupts
assume that interrupts are listed in ascending order of physical cpu id
(MPIDR.Aff{2,1,0}). This is problematic for drivers because:
(1) The driver must convert each physical id to a logical id for the purpose of
ma
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 01:44:38PM +0200, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> Hi Felipe,
>
> On 10/26/2012 10:13 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:37:33AM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>>
Hi Felipe,
On 10/26/2012 10:13 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:37:33AM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 03:36:43PM +0530, kishon wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday 1
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 14:35 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >> I can see that you applied these patches and they are present in
> >> linux-next. But i feel
> >> the order of patches is bad.
> > Yes looks like I forgot to sort the mbox series :(
> >
> > since all patches were applied nicely, and they s
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 14:25 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hi Vinod,
>
> On 16 October 2012 09:49, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > dw_dmac driver already supports device tree but it used to have its platform
> > data passed the non-DT way.
> >
> > This patch does following changes:
> > - pass platform data
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:37:33AM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 03:36:43PM +0530, kishon wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Tuesday 16 October 2012 03:23 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >> >On Tue, Oct 1
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 00:44:26, Hunter, Jon wrote:
> Hi Benoit,
>
> On 10/24/2012 10:41 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> > Hi Jon,
> >
> > On 10/19/2012 04:59 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> >> Add the 12 GP timers nodes present in OMAP2.
> >> Add the 12 GP timers nodes present in OMAP3.
> >> Add the 11 GP
On 23/10/12 14:15, Rob Herring wrote:
re-sending my reply again, as it did not appear in my inbox from dt
mailing list.
> Adding lkml. DT patches should go to both lists.
>
> On 10/23/2012 05:30 AM, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote:
>> From: Srinivas Kandagatla
>>
>> As part of of_platform_populate call,
26 matches
Mail list logo
