On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 03:37:27PM +0530, Padmavathi Venna wrote:
> sound/soc/samsung/dma.c | 24 ++--
> sound/soc/samsung/dma.h |3 +++
> sound/soc/samsung/i2s.c |3 +++
> sound/soc/samsung/smdk_wm8994.c |7 +--
> 4 files changed, 17
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> The crucial question is: can the STMPE controllers be
> used for GPIO, PWM, keypad and touchscreen at the
> *same time* or are they nailed to *one* usecase during
> electronics design?
Looking closer at the datasheet it seems to mux pins on
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2012, Shiraz Hashim wrote:
[About st-norequest-mask]
>> This is a board dependent parameter which just informs gpio driver
>> about pins, which must not be requested. It may happen for a stmpe
>> variant where such gpio pins are
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 12:38:38 +0900, Alex Courbot wrote:
>> On Monday 26 November 2012 19:14:31 Grant Likely wrote:
>> > I don't have any problem with a gpio_get function, but I do agree that
>> > making it return an opaque handle is how it sh
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Shiraz Hashim wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:28:23AM +, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>
>>> Doesn't pinctrl normally handle this kind of stuff?
>>
>> Yes, but I think it is only for managing the SoC and its p
On 1 December 2012 22:17, Linus Walleij wrote:
> If you can, try to avoid this:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> That kind om message encoding makes my life a living hell
> (but I fixed it, manually editing the whole patch) how did
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
wrote:
> On 15:43 Wed 21 Nov , Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
>> wrote:
>>
>> > HI,
>> >
>> > This patch serie add the support of gpio-export to DT
>> >
>> >
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Since the very first patch, stmpe core driver is using irq_invert_polarity as
> part of platform data. But, nobody is actually using it in kernel till now.
>
> Also, this is not something part of hardware specs, but is included to cater
> som
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> From: Vipul Kumar Samar
>
> This patch allows the STMPE GPIO driver to be successfully probed and
> initialised when Device Tree support is enabled. Bindings are mentioned in
> Documentation too.
>
> Acked-by: Lee Jones
> Signed-off-by: Vi
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Shiraz Hashim wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:28:23AM +, Lee Jones wrote:
>>
>> Doesn't pinctrl normally handle this kind of stuff?
>
> Yes, but I think it is only for managing the SoC and its pads.
No pinctrl is also for off-SoC pin controllers, you can
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 03:37:26PM +0530, Padmavathi Venna wrote:
> Add the basic device tree based lookup.
>
> Signed-off-by: Padmavathi Venna
> ---
> sound/soc/samsung/smdk_wm8994.c | 23 +++
Any new device tree bindings need binding documentation.
Your subject line is a
Previously, the ASoC 'platform' (PCM/DMA) object was instantiated via a
platform_device. This didn't represent the hardware well, since there
was no separate hardware associated with this platform_device; it was a
virtual device with sole purpose to call snd_soc_register_platform().
This change re
Samsung audio DMA device and machine device were getting registered as
platform devices with out having any real H/W peripherials associated
with them. With device tree support we can't add these platform devices
in the machine file. So Added basic device tree based look up for the
machine device.
Add the basic device tree based lookup.
Signed-off-by: Padmavathi Venna
---
sound/soc/samsung/smdk_wm8994.c | 23 +++
1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/samsung/smdk_wm8994.c b/sound/soc/samsung/smdk_wm8994.c
index 48dd4dd..f9ba2b9 100
14 matches
Mail list logo
