On 04/27/13 09:34, Olof Johansson wrote:
[...]
On Universal C210 board, both with and without DT:
Tested-by: Tomasz Figat.f...@samsung.com
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmanna...@arndb.de
Olof, Kgene, I think we should have this one in 3.10 since it fixes
a regression. It looks bigger than it
In clk-si5351 there was some dependency to CONFIG_OF that permitted the
use of the driver on !CONFIG_OF platforms. This patch adds proper #ifdef
around of_clk_add_provider and removes the dependency on CONFIG_OF.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth sebastian.hesselba...@gmail.com
---
Note:
This
On 15:39 Wed 24 Apr , Markus Pargmann wrote:
Add devicetree support for imx framebuffer driver. It uses the generic
display bindings and helper functions.
Signed-off-by: Markus Pargmann m...@pengutronix.de
Cc: Fabio Estevam feste...@gmail.com
Cc: Mark Rutland mark.rutl...@arm.com
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 05:43:31AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
Iterating through subnodes with libfdt is a little painful to write as we
need something like this:
for (depth = 0, count = 0,
offset = fdt_next_node(fdt, parent_offset, depth);
(offset = 0) (depth 0);
2013/4/27 Tomasz Figa tomasz.f...@gmail.com
On Friday 26 of April 2013 11:48:50 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 04/26/2013 10:20 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
Exactly right. it's my mistake. But now it seems that
__mode_of_device_table is multi defined at fimd and g2d side so there
still is module
2013/4/27 Sylwester Nawrocki sylvester.nawro...@gmail.com
On 04/26/2013 09:42 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Friday 26 of April 2013 11:48:50 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 04/26/2013 10:20 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
Exactly right. it's my mistake. But now it seems that
__mode_of_device_table is multi
On Sunday 28 April 2013, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-si5351.c b/drivers/clk/clk-si5351.c
index 8323c31..91c0f01 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-si5351.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-si5351.c
@@ -1489,12 +1489,14 @@ static int si5351_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 03:52:33PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
On 04/27/13 09:34, Olof Johansson wrote:
[...]
On Universal C210 board, both with and without DT:
Tested-by: Tomasz Figat.f...@samsung.com
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmanna...@arndb.de
Olof, Kgene, I think we should have this
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 05:46:32PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
This patch extends exynos_init_time() function to handle Exynos4210 rev0
SoC, which differs in availability of system timers and needs different
clocksource initialization.
This makes it possible to use exynos_init_time() function
On Sunday 28 of April 2013 12:22:31 Olof Johansson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 05:46:32PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
This patch extends exynos_init_time() function to handle Exynos4210
rev0 SoC, which differs in availability of system timers and needs
different clocksource initialization.
Hi Lukasz/Eduardo,
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Eduardo Valentin
eduardo.valen...@ti.com wrote:
Amit, Lukasz,
On 25-04-2013 09:29, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
Hi Amit,
Hi Lukasz Majewski,
Sorry for late review but I am currently working on restructuring the
whole exynos thermal driver
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 6:20 AM, Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com wrote:
Hi, all,
what is the status now?
which one is preferred, this one or the one from Amit's patch set?
Hi Rui,
I have still not submitted LDO support in the TMU driver. I will
re-base Lukasz patches on top of my patch series
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Eduardo Valentin
eduardo.valen...@ti.com wrote:
On 25-04-2013 08:30, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
Device tree support for TMU at Exynos4x12 targets.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski l.majew...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
Hi Rui,
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Eduardo Valentin
eduardo.valen...@ti.com wrote:
On 25-04-2013 08:30, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
Proper description for Exynos4 bindings added to Documentation/devicetree/
bindings
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski l.majew...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by:
14 matches
Mail list logo
