Re: [PATCH] of: Specify initrd location using 64-bit

2013-06-29 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 1:43 AM, Santosh Shilimkar santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote: Rob, Are you ok with phys_addr_t since your concern was about rest of the memory specific bits of the device-tree code use u64 ? No. I still think it should be u64 for same reasons I said originally. +1 +1

Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] ARM: dts: imx27 Phytec phyCARD-S

2013-06-29 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 04:50:32PM +0200, Markus Pargmann wrote: Hi, This series adds some device nodes for imx27 and board files for Phytec phyCARD-S SOM and RDK. It is based on shawn's branch imx/dt. Looks good to me. Acked-by: Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de Sascha -- Pengutronix

Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] phy: Add driver for Exynos MIPI CSIS/DSIM DPHYs

2013-06-29 Thread Kishon Vijay Abraham I
Hi, On Friday 28 June 2013 03:41 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: On 06/28/2013 10:17 AM, Hui Wang wrote: On 06/26/2013 11:02 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: Add a PHY provider driver for the Samsung S5P/Exynos SoC MIPI CSI-2 receiver and MIPI DSI transmitter DPHYs. Signed-off-by: Sylwester

Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] phy: Add driver for Exynos DP PHY

2013-06-29 Thread Kishon Vijay Abraham I
Hi, On Friday 28 June 2013 12:45 PM, Jingoo Han wrote: Add a PHY provider driver for the Samsung Exynos SoC DP PHY. Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han jg1@samsung.com --- .../phy/samsung,exynos5250-dp-video-phy.txt|7 ++ drivers/phy/Kconfig|8 ++

Re: binding for nvec mfd device

2013-06-29 Thread Marc Dietrich
On Friday 28 June 2013 09:13:38 Stephen Warren wrote: On 06/27/2013 12:26 PM, Marc Dietrich wrote: Hi, (CC'ing linux-tegra) I'm puzzling for some time now to find a binding for a mfd device. So let's start with something I think I have learned already, let's describe the hardware.

[PATCH v5 00/12] MBus DT binding: A new hope

2013-06-29 Thread Ezequiel Garcia
See the previous version of this patchset for further context: http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg253342.html This is a new proposal, in an attempt to fix some obscurities in the previous MBus DT binding proposal. In the current proposal we have now required a 'controller' property to

[PATCH v5 02/12] bus: mvebu-mbus: Introduce device tree binding

2013-06-29 Thread Ezequiel Garcia
This patch adds the most fundamental device-tree initialization. We only introduce what's required to be able to probe the mvebu-mbus driver from the DT. Follow-up patches will extend the device tree binding, allowing to describe static address decoding windows. Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni

[PATCH v5 03/12] bus: mvebu-mbus: Add static window allocation to the DT binding

2013-06-29 Thread Ezequiel Garcia
This patch adds static window allocation to the device tree binding. Each first-child of the mbus-compatible node, with a suitable 'ranges' property, declaring an address translation, will trigger an address decoding window allocation. Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia

[PATCH v5 01/12] bus: mvebu-mbus: Factor out initialization details

2013-06-29 Thread Ezequiel Garcia
We introduce a common initialization function mvebu_mbus_common_init() that will be used by both legacy and device-tree initialization code. This patch is an intermediate step, which will allow to introduce the DT binding for this driver in a less intrusive way. Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni

[PATCH v5 05/12] ARM: mvebu: Remove the harcoded BootROM window allocation

2013-06-29 Thread Ezequiel Garcia
The address decoding window to access the BootROM should not be allocated programatically, but instead declared in the device tree. Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com --- arch/arm/mach-mvebu/platsmp.c | 25 - 1 file changed, 24

[PATCH v5 07/12] ARM: mvebu: Use the preprocessor on Armada 370/XP device tree files

2013-06-29 Thread Ezequiel Garcia
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com --- arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370-db.dts | 2 +- arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370-mirabox.dts | 2 +- arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370-rd.dts | 2 +- arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370.dtsi| 2 +-

[PATCH v5 04/12] ARM: mvebu: Initialize MBus using the DT binding

2013-06-29 Thread Ezequiel Garcia
Now that the mbus device tree binding has been introduced, we can switch over to it. Also, and since the initialization of the mbus driver is quite fundamental for the system to work properly, this patch adds a BUG() in case mbus fails to initialize. Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia

[PATCH v5 06/12] memory: mvebu-devbus: Remove address decoding window workaround

2013-06-29 Thread Ezequiel Garcia
Now that mbus device tree binding has been introduced, remove the address decoding window management from this driver. A suitable 'ranges' entry should be added to the devbus-compatible node in the device tree, as described by the mbus binding documentation. Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman

[PATCH v5 08/12] ARM: mvebu: Add MBus to Armada 370/XP device tree

2013-06-29 Thread Ezequiel Garcia
The Armada 370/XP SoC family has a completely configurable address space handled by the MBus controller. This patch introduces the device tree layout of MBus, making the 'soc' node as mbus-compatible. Since every peripheral/controller is a child of this 'soc' node, this makes all of them sit

[PATCH v5 10/12] ARM: mvebu: Relocate Armada 370/XP DeviceBus device tree nodes

2013-06-29 Thread Ezequiel Garcia
Now that mbus has been added to the device tree, it's possible to move the DeviceBus out of internal registers, placing it directly below the mbus. This is a more accurate representation of the hardware. Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com ---

[PATCH v5 09/12] ARM: mvebu: Add BootROM to Armada 370/XP device tree

2013-06-29 Thread Ezequiel Garcia
In order to access the SoC BootROM, we need to declare a mapping (through a ranges property). The mbus driver will use this property to allocate a suitable address decoding window. Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com --- arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-370-db.dts

[PATCH v5 12/12] ARM: mvebu: Relocate Armada XP PCIe device tree nodes

2013-06-29 Thread Ezequiel Garcia
Now that mbus has been added to the device tree, it's possible to move the PCIe nodes out of internal registers, placing it directly below the mbus. This is a more accurate representation of the hardware. Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com ---

[PATCH v5 11/12] ARM: mvebu: Relocate Armada 370 PCIe device tree nodes

2013-06-29 Thread Ezequiel Garcia
Now that mbus has been added to the device tree, it's possible to move the PCIe nodes out of internal registers, placing it directly below the mbus. This is a more accurate representation of the hardware. Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com ---

Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] phy: Add driver for Exynos MIPI CSIS/DSIM DPHYs

2013-06-29 Thread Sylwester Nawrocki
Hi, On 06/29/2013 10:57 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: On Friday 28 June 2013 03:41 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: On 06/28/2013 10:17 AM, Hui Wang wrote: On 06/26/2013 11:02 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: Add a PHY provider driver for the Samsung S5P/Exynos SoC MIPI CSI-2 receiver and MIPI

Re: [PATCH v5 06/12] memory: mvebu-devbus: Remove address decoding window workaround

2013-06-29 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 04:04:09PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: Now that mbus device tree binding has been introduced, remove the address decoding window management from this driver. A suitable 'ranges' entry should be added to the devbus-compatible node in the device tree, as described by

Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] DT: Add documentation for gpio-xilinx

2013-06-29 Thread Linus Walleij
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Michal Simek mon...@monstr.eu wrote: I commented your comment on v1, and said I think you can support both bindings. in 2/6 you have applied that dual support for this driver and that's why please add this binding description to your repo because it reflects

Re: [PATCH 1/1] of/documentation: Update s5m8767-regulator bindings document

2013-06-29 Thread Sachin Kamat
On 28 June 2013 17:05, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote: On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:56:12AM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote: There is no change in the bindings, but just a correction in the documentation to reflect the implementation. Earlier when Samsung platforms did not have pinctrl driver,