On Friday 12 July 2013, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/dma/mpc512x-dma.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> +/*
> + * This header file provides symbolic specifiers for DMA channels
> + * within the MPC512x SoC's DMA controller. Since requester lines
> + * directly map to channel numbers and n
On 07/13/2013 10:35 AM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 13:00:23 -0600 Daniel Drake wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
- the phandles to the clocks does not tell how the clock may be set by
the driver (it is an array index in the 510).
In
From: "Lad, Prabhakar"
add OF support for the adv7343 driver.
Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar
---
Changes for v2:
1: Fixed naming of properties.
.../devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/adv7343.txt | 54
drivers/media/i2c/adv7343.c| 65 +
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 12:56:50PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 07/13/2013 10:35 AM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
>> On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 13:00:23 -0600 Daniel Drake wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Jean-Francois Moine
>>> wrote:
>
- the phandles to the clocks does not tel
[ MPC8308 knowledge required, see below ]
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 09:17 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> On Friday 12 July 2013, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
> > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/dma/mpc512x-dma.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> > +/*
> > + * This header file provides symbolic specifiers for DMA channels
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 2:35 AM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> I use my Cubox for daily jobs as a desktop computer. My kernel is a DT
> driven 3.10.0. The dove-drm, tda998x and si5351 (clock) are kernel
> modules. I set 3 clocks in the DT for the LCD0: lcdclk, axi and extclk0
> (si5351). Normally,
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Haojian Zhuang
wrote:
> These patches couldn't be applied. Since we're moving irq drivers from arch
> directories to irq directories.
It does not seem in line with the collaborative manner of kernel
development to block my patches for a whole month because they
co
Dear Grant Likely,
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 23:44:21 +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> I think this discussion is going in the wrong direction. The concept
> of a dummy phy is really a Linux kernel internal detail. Creating some
> kind of dummy MDIO bus node does not describe the hardware.
This is exactly
On 07/13/2013 04:25 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 2:35 AM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
I use my Cubox for daily jobs as a desktop computer. My kernel is a DT
driven 3.10.0. The dove-drm, tda998x and si5351 (clock) are kernel
modules. I set 3 clocks in the DT for the LCD0: lcdcl
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 08:25:15AM -0600, Daniel Drake wrote:
> I guess the IRE falls into the same category as the DCON - we won't
> implement it for now, but knowing where it might fit in is useful.
I don't see much need at the moment for IRE. IRE isn't going to be
useful for general graphics r
On 07/13/2013 01:12 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 12:56:50PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 07/13/2013 10:35 AM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 13:00:23 -0600 Daniel Drake wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Jason Cooper wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:08:50PM +0800, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Jason Cooper wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 04:19:46PM +0800, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Jason Cooper w
Hi Matthieu,
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 03:56:02AM -0600, mathieu.poir...@linaro.org wrote:
> +
> + np = of_find_node_by_path("/chosen");
> + if (!np)
> + goto out;
> +
> + np = of_find_node_by_name(np, "linux,sysrq-reset-seq");
> + if (!np) {
> + pr_debug("No
On 07/13/2013 07:44 PM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
On 07/13/2013 01:12 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 12:56:50PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 07/13/2013 10:35 AM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 13:00:23 -0600 Daniel Drake wrote:
On Fri, Ju
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 07:44:58PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> On 07/13/2013 01:12 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> When I designed the clk API, I arranged for things like clk_get() to
>> take a reference on the module if the clock was supplied by a module.
>> You'll see some eviden
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 10:43:29PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> I wasn't aware of it, thanks. I've seen a patch from Jiada Wang, it seems
> they're working on v4 with clock object reference counting. Presumably we
> need both clk_get() to be taking reference on the module and reference
> coun
On 07/13/2013 11:02 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 10:43:29PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
I wasn't aware of it, thanks. I've seen a patch from Jiada Wang, it seems
they're working on v4 with clock object reference counting. Presumably we
need both clk_get() to b
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 12:16:58AM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 07/13/2013 11:02 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 10:43:29PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>>> I wasn't aware of it, thanks. I've seen a patch from Jiada Wang, it seems
>>> they're working on v
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 08:26:47PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> I think the KS would be a good opportunity to present the status quo,
>> show some rules of thumb and finally discuss if we can improve the
>> process even further. E.g., shou
19 matches
Mail list logo
