On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 6:10 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Grant Likely
> Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 18:15:34 -0700
>
>> What is the best way to transfer a membership list over? Can I import
>> a list, or do I need to tell everyone to register on the new list?
>
> I really prefer that everyone manu
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 1:29 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Sat, 2013-07-20 at 17:17 -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Grant Likely
>>> wrote:
>>> > Device tree bindings require a lot more attention than they
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 07/19/2013 10:19 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
>> +OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS
>> +M: Pawel Moll
>> +M: Mark Rutland
>> +M: Stephen Warren
>> +M: Ian Campbell
>
> You can add me. I was not intending to step down.
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> Perhaps it is time to also place the official repo
> of the Device Tree Compiler on git,kernel.org as well?
I'm fine with that. I can't say I'm excited about options like github.
g.
___
devicetree-
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 07/21/2013 09:42 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On 07/19/2013 01:14 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>>> So I called of_platform_populate() on a device to get each child device
>>> probed and on rmmod and I need to reverse its doing. After a
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> We can debate whether the driver order matters or not, but either way
> I'm not sure this patch does the right thing. It doesn't really look
> correct to me, but I haven't dug into it.
>
> We've already tried to fix matching and reverted the fi
On 07/21/2013 09:42 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 07/19/2013 01:14 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>> So I called of_platform_populate() on a device to get each child device
>> probed and on rmmod and I need to reverse its doing. After a quick grep
>> I did what others did as well and rmmod ende
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 12:44 AM, Grant Likely
wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jul 2013 16:10:53 +0800, Huang Shijie wrote:
>> 于 2013年07月09日 15:51, Sascha Hauer 写道:
>> > On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 03:46:34PM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote:
>> >> 于 2013年07月09日 15:05, Sascha Hauer 写道:
>> >>> Why don't you set the match
On 07/21/2013 04:42 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> Wouldn't the correct fix be to call insert_resource somehow?
Yes unless there was a reason this wasn't done in the first place.
> The problem
> I have is that while of_platform_populate is all about parsing the DT
> and creating devices, the removal si
On Sun, 21 Jul 2013, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> > What's wrong with the platform_data structure, why can't that be used
> > for this?
>
> At the point the platform data of some driver is initialized, e.g. in
> board setup code the PHY pointer is not known, since the PHY supplier
> driver has not
On 07/19/2013 10:19 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> Device tree bindings require a lot more attention than they used to.
> We've got a group of volunteers willing to take over maintaining
> bindings. This patch adds them to the MAINTAINERS file.
>
> This group still needs to work out a process for maint
On 07/18/2013 11:19 AM, Oleksandr Kravchenko wrote:
> From: Oleksandr Kravchenko
>
> This patch adds IIO driver for APDS9300 ambient light sensor (ALS).
> http://www.avagotech.com/docs/AV02-1077EN
>
> The driver allows to read raw data from ADC registers or calculate
> lux value. It also can handl
On 07/21/2013 05:48 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 12:22:48PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 07:59:10PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 10:32:26PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 20 Jul 2013, Greg KH wrote:
That should be passed using platform d
On 07/20/2013 02:05 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 07/18/2013 12:19 PM, Oleksandr Kravchenko wrote:
>> From: Grygorii Strashko
>>
>> Add a resource managed devm_iio_device_alloc()/devm_iio_device_free()
>> to automatically clean up any allocations made by IIO drivers,
>> thus leading to simpli
On Sun, 2013-07-21 at 08:05 +, Chaiken, Alison wrote:
> David Woodhouse wrote:
> >> I've heard tales of people having to keep device-tree files for their
> >> board tightly in sync with the specific *version* of the Linux kernel
> >> that they were shipped with.
>
> Assuredly if in a kernel u
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> I carry forward my TI internal objection to this approach:
It is actually a very good sign of FOSS-maturity that you as a company
take unresolved architectural issues to the community. Kudos!
> Lets see what happens as a result of this:
>
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> The Peripheral irq/dma requests are connected to one crossbar's input
>> and the output of the crossbar is connected to controller's input
>> line. On POR, there are some mappings which are done by default.
>> Those peripherals which do not
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 12:22:48PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 07:59:10PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 10:32:26PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > On Sat, 20 Jul 2013, Greg KH wrote:
> > >
> > > > > >>That should be passed using platform data.
> > > > >
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 01:12:07PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Sunday 21 of July 2013 16:37:33 Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sunday 21 July 2013 04:01 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Saturday 20 of July 2013 19:59:10 Greg KH wrote:
> > >> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013
Dear Andrew Lunn,
On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 21:45:59 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > The patchset works only for Armada 370 and Armada XP SoC, not for Kirkwood.
> > For some reason I was completely sure there wasn't any DT-enabled Kirkwood
> > boards with PCIe support.
>
> I had a quick look at Dove and
On 07/19/2013 01:14 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> So I called of_platform_populate() on a device to get each child device
> probed and on rmmod and I need to reverse its doing. After a quick grep
> I did what others did as well and rmmod ended in:
>
> | Unable to handle kernel NULL pointe
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 5:19 AM, Grant Likely wrote
> :
>
> > Device tree bindings require a lot more attention than they used to.
> > We've got a group of volunteers willing to take over maintaining
> > bindings. This patch adds them to the MAINTAINERS file.
> >
> > This group still needs to w
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 04:46:47AM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> A number of us had a face-to-face meeting in Dublin last week to talk
> about DT maintainership and the fact that it simply isn't working right
> now. Neither Rob nor I can keep up with the load and there are a lot of
> poorly designed
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Chaiken, Alison
wrote:
> Linus Walleij (linus.wall...@linaro.org) responds:
>>multiple things are compiled together and stuffed into
>>an image, the device tree and kernel is always recompiled at every
>>image composition. Everything is versioned in sync.
>
> Ar
On Sunday 21 of July 2013 16:37:33 Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sunday 21 July 2013 04:01 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Saturday 20 of July 2013 19:59:10 Greg KH wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 10:32:26PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 20 Jul 2013, Greg KH wr
Hi,
On Sunday 21 July 2013 04:01 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
Hi,
On Saturday 20 of July 2013 19:59:10 Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 10:32:26PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 20 Jul 2013, Greg KH wrote:
That should be passed using platform data.
Ick, don't pass strings around, pass po
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:48:39PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 07/18/2013 03:21 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:18:05AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> On 07/18/2013 07:53 AM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> >>> Hello Guenter,
> >>>
> >>> On 17-07-2013 18:09, Guenter Roeck
Hi,
On Saturday 20 of July 2013 19:59:10 Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 10:32:26PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Sat, 20 Jul 2013, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > >>That should be passed using platform data.
> > > > >
> > > > >Ick, don't pass strings around, pass pointers. If you have
> > > >
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 07:59:10PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 10:32:26PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Sat, 20 Jul 2013, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > > > >>That should be passed using platform data.
> > > > >
> > > > >Ick, don't pass strings around, pass pointers. If you have pla
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 02:56:19PM -0400, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> On 19-07-2013 14:45, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > On 07/19/2013 07:38 AM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> >> On 18-07-2013 17:11, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 09:53:05AM -0400, Eduardo Valentin
> >>> wrote:
> Hell
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 1:29 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-07-20 at 17:17 -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Grant Likely
>> wrote:
>> > Device tree bindings require a lot more attention than they used to.
>> > We've got a group of volunteers willing to take
David Woodhouse wrote:
>> I've heard tales of people having to keep device-tree files for their
>> board tightly in sync with the specific *version* of the Linux kernel
>> that they were shipped with.
Assuredly if in a kernel update a driver adds new features which are enabled by
new properties
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 05:40:05PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:07:36PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> >
> > > Do we need a kernel summit discussion, or do we just need a good
> > > document? Or, to phrase the
33 matches
Mail list logo
