On 07/04/13 15:26, Sascha Hauer wrote:
Honestly I'm annoyed by this aswell. The devicetree contains a nice and
complete hardware description and it seems convenient to put hardware
related configuration data there aswell.
Yes
The problem is that hardware description and configuration data are
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [RANT]
>
> I tend to disagree about this whole hype about device tree usage for other
> things than pure hardware description. I don't think device tree should be
> a way to force some kind of new world order, but rather a more convenien
On 28/03/13 08:32, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 07:43:40PM +0100, Martin Fuzzey wrote:
Maybe pinctrl entries should also be added?
Generally, the pinctrl entries should be added in .dts.
Yes sorry I meant the pinctrl groups under the iomuxc node.
Regards,
Martin
On 27/03/13 18:30, Philipp Zabel wrote:
Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53.dtsi | 27 +++
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53.dtsi
index b07bbdcc..30aed40 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot
Hi Philipp,
On 27/03/13 18:30, Philipp Zabel wrote:
+static bool imx_ldb_encoder_mode_fixup(struct drm_encoder *encoder,
+ const struct drm_display_mode *mode,
+ struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode)
+{
+/*
+ struct imx_ldb_channel *imx_l
Hi Philipp,
On 26/03/13 15:13, Philipp Zabel wrote:
+static void imx_ldb_encoder_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
+{
+ struct imx_ldb_channel *imx_ldb_ch = enc_to_imx_ldb_ch(encoder);
+ struct imx_ldb *ldb = imx_ldb_ch->ldb;
+
+ if (gpio_is_valid(imx_ldb_ch->enable_gpio))
On 25/03/13 14:29, Sascha Hauer wrote:
Put it differently. OpenBSD might have much better clock support.
Imagine it can dynamically figure out the correct esdhc frequencies
for different usecases on the fly. In this situation it would be
counterproductive if Linux requires static values for the
Hi Sascha,
thanks for the comments.
[corrected Mike's email address - I originally sent it to the old one]
On 25/03/13 11:17, Sascha Hauer wrote:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 06:09:33PM +0100, Martin Fuzzey wrote:
Even on platforms where the entire clock tree is not represented in the DT
i
specific information and thus would be better in the DT.
Signed-off-by: Martin Fuzzey
---
Sending as RFC for the moment in a single patch together with an example
for i.MX53. Will split if this goes anywhere.
---
.../bindings/clock/clock-configuration.txt | 35 +
arch/arm/mach-imx
Hi Markus,
I've already submitted basically this and it's in linux-next:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git;a=commitdiff;h=28c55dc1acc863cb29832b5be2464ebcdafdc3d5
Also:
+Example:
+ w1: w1@10009000 {
+ compatible = "fsl,imx27-w1";
+
On 16/01/13 17:36, Mark Rutland wrote:
Hi,
This looks nice and simple, I just have a couple of comment.
Thank you
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 09:48:23AM +, Martin Fuzzey wrote:
Signed-off-by: Martin Fuzzey
---
drivers/w1/masters/mxc_w1.c |9 -
1 files changed, 8 insertions
On 22/01/13 15:09, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:27:12AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 03:57:49PM +0100, Martin Fuzzey wrote:
>>> W1: Support onewire master on i.MX53
>>> * Add device tree and pinctrl support to the MXC master
> This is because that series is based on Peter Chen's work. I should have
> mentioned this in the cover-letter mail. You can merge his master branch
> before adding my series:
Ok thanks for the very rapid reply.
I've now built this together with patch 2 "ci13xxx_imx: add 2nd and
3rd clock to sup
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Michael Grzeschik
wrote:
> @@ -213,6 +216,15 @@ static int __devinit ci13xxx_imx_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> goto put_np;
> }
>
> + if (usbmisc_ops && usbmisc_ops->post) {
> + ret = usbmisc_ops->post(&p
14 matches
Mail list logo
