On Sat, 27 Apr 2013, Wei Yongjun wrote:
From: Wei Yongjun yongjun_...@trendmicro.com.cn
Remove duplicated include.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun yongjun_...@trendmicro.com.cn
Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com
arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Rob Herring wrote:
On 09/14/2012 09:26 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:13:08PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Add a doc to describe the Xen ARM device tree bindings
Changes in v4
-cells and #size-cells for the example.
Changes in v4:
- xen,xen should be last as it is less specific;
- update reg property using 2 address-cells and 2 size-cells.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com
CC: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
CC: David Vrabel
Add a doc to describe the Xen ARM device tree bindings
Changes in v4:
- xen,xen should be last as it is less specific;
- update reg property using 2 address-cells and 2 size-cells.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com
CC: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
CC
On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:13:08PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Add a doc to describe the Xen ARM device tree bindings
Changes in v4:
- xen,xen should be last as it is less specific;
- update reg property using 2 address-cells
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Dave Martin wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 07:14:58PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
- hcall-instructions
potentially interesting, but given that for Xen we are quite happy with
HVC, we are not going to add any
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Dave Martin wrote:
Do you think it's feasible to standardise on some interoperable ABI for
kvm and Xen? This sounds pretty optimistic, but I'm not aware of all
the technicalities, or what possible third-party hypervisors are out
there.
If we could do it, it would be
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Rob Herring wrote:
On 09/12/2012 01:14 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Rob Herring wrote:
You should look at ePAPR 1.1 which defines hypervisor related bindings.
While it is a PPC doc, we should reuse
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Rob Herring wrote:
On 08/16/2012 10:35 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Add a doc to describe the Xen ARM device tree bindings
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com
CC: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
CC: David Vrabel david.vra
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Rob Herring wrote:
You should look at ePAPR 1.1 which defines hypervisor related bindings.
While it is a PPC doc, we should reuse or extend what makes sense.
See section 7.5:
https://www.power.org/resources
Add a doc to describe the Xen ARM device tree bindings
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com
CC: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
CC: David Vrabel david.vra...@citrix.com
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/xen.txt | 22 ++
1 files
11 matches
Mail list logo
