On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 09:29:10AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 3/22/2012 9:20 PM, Stefan Roese wrote:
This patch adds support to configure the SPEAr EHCI OHCI driver via
device-tree instead of platform_data.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese s...@denx.de
Cc: Viresh Kumar
On 3/22/2012 9:20 PM, Stefan Roese wrote:
This patch adds support to configure the SPEAr EHCI OHCI driver via
device-tree instead of platform_data.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese s...@denx.de
Cc: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@st.com
---
.../devicetree/bindings/usb/spear-usb.txt | 39
Hi Viresh,
On Friday 23 March 2012 04:48:05 Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 3/22/2012 9:20 PM, Stefan Roese wrote:
+static struct of_device_id spear_ohci_id_table[] __devinitdata = {
+ { .compatible = st,spear600-ohci, },
Hi Stefan,
I have this question for other drivers (fsmc, stmmac...) as
On 3/23/2012 1:30 PM, Stefan Roese wrote:
There could be differences between the IP cores integrated into the SoCs. I
only tested on spear600, so thats what I integrated into the drivers. While
supporting more SoCs (SPEAr300 etc) to those drivers, you should add the
specific compatible
On 03/23/2012 03:07 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 3/23/2012 1:30 PM, Stefan Roese wrote:
There could be differences between the IP cores integrated into the SoCs. I
only tested on spear600, so thats what I integrated into the drivers. While
supporting more SoCs (SPEAr300 etc) to those drivers,
This patch adds support to configure the SPEAr EHCI OHCI driver via
device-tree instead of platform_data.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese s...@denx.de
Cc: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@st.com
---
.../devicetree/bindings/usb/spear-usb.txt | 39
On 3/22/2012 9:20 PM, Stefan Roese wrote:
+static struct of_device_id spear_ohci_id_table[] __devinitdata = {
+ { .compatible = st,spear600-ohci, },
Hi Stefan,
I have this question for other drivers (fsmc, stmmac...) as well:
Why do we name it spear600-ohci and not spear-ohci?
Because i
