On 11/19/2012 10:45 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> This adds following helper routines:
> - of_property_read_u8_array()
> - of_property_read_u16_array()
> - of_property_read_u8()
> - of_property_read_u16()
>
> This expects arrays from DT to be passed as:
> - u8 array:
> property = /bits/ 8 <0x50
On 11/19/2012 09:45 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> This adds following helper routines:
> - of_property_read_u8_array()
> - of_property_read_u16_array()
> - of_property_read_u8()
> - of_property_read_u16()
>
> This expects arrays from DT to be passed as:
> - u8 array:
> property = /bits/ 8 <0x50
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 10:15 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> This adds following helper routines:
> - of_property_read_u8_array()
> - of_property_read_u16_array()
> - of_property_read_u8()
> - of_property_read_u16()
>
> This expects arrays from DT to be passed as:
> - u8 array:
> property = /bi
On 20 November 2012 13:51, Shevchenko, Andriy
wrote:
> You could at least create macro to do a precheck if you want to.
>
> Like
> #define CHECK_PROP(prop, sz, out)
>
> {
> if (!prop)
> return -EINVAL;
> if (!prop->value)
> return -ENODATA;
> if ((sz
This adds following helper routines:
- of_property_read_u8_array()
- of_property_read_u16_array()
- of_property_read_u8()
- of_property_read_u16()
This expects arrays from DT to be passed as:
- u8 array:
property = /bits/ 8 <0x50 0x60 0x70>;
- u16 array:
property = /bits/ 16 <0x500
On 10/25/2012 02:03 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 12 October 2012 23:31, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> This adds following helper routines:
>> - of_property_read_u8_array()
>> - of_property_read_u16_array()
>> - of_property_read_u8()
>> - of_property_read_u16()
>>
>> First two actually share most of the c
