On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 21:49:27 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 07/18/2013 05:24 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > It almost does not matter because most users use only the ->start member
> > of the struct. However if this struct is passed to a platform device
> > which is then added via platfo
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
wrote:
> On 07/19/2013 04:49 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On 07/18/2013 05:24 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>>> It almost does not matter because most users use only the ->start member
>>> of the struct. However if this struct is passe
On 07/19/2013 04:49 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 07/18/2013 05:24 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>> It almost does not matter because most users use only the ->start member
>> of the struct. However if this struct is passed to a platform device
>> which is then added via platform_device_add()
On 07/18/2013 05:24 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> It almost does not matter because most users use only the ->start member
> of the struct. However if this struct is passed to a platform device
> which is then added via platform_device_add() then the ->parent member is
> also used.
Most u
It almost does not matter because most users use only the ->start member
of the struct. However if this struct is passed to a platform device
which is then added via platform_device_add() then the ->parent member is
also used.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
---
drivers/of/irq.c | 1 +
