On 23 February 2011 19:54, Andres Salomon dilin...@queued.net wrote:
Wait; why are you binding to a device based on name? Binding by name
and/or device_type is strongly discouraged for new code. Use
compatible instead.
Daniel posted a separate patch showing his code, would you mind
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 07:06:59PM -0800, Andres Salomon wrote:
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 23:42:57 +
Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 16 February 2011 22:44, David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org
wrote:
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 22:28 +, Daniel Drake wrote:
+static int __init
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 12:43:52 -0700
Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 07:06:59PM -0800, Andres Salomon wrote:
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 23:42:57 +
Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 16 February 2011 22:44, David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org
Commit e2f2a93b changed dp-name from using the 'name' property to
using package-to-path. This fixed /proc/device-tree creation by
eliminating conflicts between names (the 'name' property provides
names like 'battery', whereas package-to-path provides names like
'/foo/bar/battery@0', which we
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 03:03:57PM -0800, Andres Salomon wrote:
Commit e2f2a93b changed dp-name from using the 'name' property to
using package-to-path. This fixed /proc/device-tree creation by
eliminating conflicts between names (the 'name' property provides
names like 'battery', whereas
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:28:15 -0700
Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 03:03:57PM -0800, Andres Salomon wrote:
Commit e2f2a93b changed dp-name from using the 'name' property to
using package-to-path. This fixed /proc/device-tree creation by
eliminating
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:47:08 -0700
Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 04:34:42PM -0800, Andres Salomon wrote:
Commit e2f2a93b changed dp-name from using the 'name' property to
using package-to-path. This fixed /proc/device-tree creation by
eliminating
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 06:51:52PM -0800, Andres Salomon wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:47:08 -0700
Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
This addresses one of my comments on v2; but it doesn't address the
comment that the broken implementation of of_pdt_node_name for
non-sparc
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 04:16:30PM -0800, Andres Salomon wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:28:15 -0700
Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 03:03:57PM -0800, Andres Salomon wrote:
Commit e2f2a93b changed dp-name from using the 'name' property to
using
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 08:36:49PM -0800, Andres Salomon wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 21:06:38 -0700
Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
If the pkg2path hook isn't set and we're not sparc, we fall back to
dp-name. That sucks, but I don't know of a better way to do
things.
Commit e2f2a93b changed dp-name from using the 'name' property to
using package-to-path. This fixed /proc/device-tree creation by
eliminating conflicts between names (the 'name' property provides
names like 'battery', whereas package-to-path provides names like
'/foo/bar/battery@0', which we
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 23:42:57 +
Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 16 February 2011 22:44, David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org
wrote:
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 22:28 +, Daniel Drake wrote:
+static int __init add_common_platform_devices(void)
+{
+ struct platform_device
12 matches
Mail list logo
