On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 01:34:30PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
[cc'ing devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org. Please cc this list for
any dt-related patches]
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
Move from being statically probed by platform presence to binding
On 20 May 2011 16:21, Anton Vorontsov cbouatmai...@gmail.com wrote:
I just wondering what happened with this patch?..
I sneakily posted it for review prematurely :)
I have a corrected version based upon all received feedback, but this
patch actually depends on another patch (for x86 tree) which
On 25 February 2011 14:19, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
/battery@0/compatible property added with value olpc-battery (XO-1 and
XO-1.5)
/pci/isa@f/rtc@i70/compatible property prepended with olpc-xo1-rtc,
That comma at the end should be dropped. I just realised that the
separator between
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 23 February 2011 20:34, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
As mentioned in the other thread, matching by name is strongly
discouraged. It isn't very accurate and compatible is the preferred
method for binding
[cc'ing devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org. Please cc this list for
any dt-related patches]
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
Move from being statically probed by platform presence to binding to
the battery node of the device tree.
This is cleaner and
