Re: [PATCH 0/2] Full DT IRQ support for versatile

2012-01-12 Thread Grant Likely
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 01:42:50AM +, Jamie Iles wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 06:20:37PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Jamie Iles wrote: > > > These patches move versatile over to instantiating both interrupt > > > controllers from the device tree.  I've t

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Full DT IRQ support for versatile

2012-01-12 Thread Jamie Iles
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 06:20:37PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Jamie Iles wrote: > > These patches move versatile over to instantiating both interrupt > > controllers from the device tree.  I've tested this in qemu for both DT > > and non-DT platforms but only wit

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Full DT IRQ support for versatile

2012-01-12 Thread Grant Likely
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Jamie Iles wrote: > These patches move versatile over to instantiating both interrupt > controllers from the device tree.  I've tested this in qemu for both DT > and non-DT platforms but only with an initramfs.  I've seen interrupts > generated on both controllers

[PATCH 0/2] Full DT IRQ support for versatile

2012-01-12 Thread Jamie Iles
These patches move versatile over to instantiating both interrupt controllers from the device tree. I've tested this in qemu for both DT and non-DT platforms but only with an initramfs. I've seen interrupts generated on both controllers for both boot methods. Grant, Rob, this makes use of irqdom