[PATCH 0/3] at_hdmac: dt dma bindings update

2013-05-30 Thread ludovic.desroches
From: Ludovic Desroches Hi, This set of patches update the dt dma binding for at_hdmac since we need one more parameter. In order to keep backward compatibility, an existing cell will be used to add this parameter. Since the content of that cell will become a magic value due to the concatenation

Re: [PATCH 0/3] at_hdmac: dt dma bindings update

2013-05-30 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 18:08 Thu 30 May , ludovic.desroc...@atmel.com wrote: > From: Ludovic Desroches > > Hi, > > This set of patches update the dt dma binding for at_hdmac since we need one > more parameter. In order to keep backward compatibility, an existing cell will > be used to add this parameter. Since

Re: [PATCH 0/3] at_hdmac: dt dma bindings update

2013-05-30 Thread Vinod Koul
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 06:08:20PM +0200, ludovic.desroc...@atmel.com wrote: > From: Ludovic Desroches > > Hi, > > This set of patches update the dt dma binding for at_hdmac since we need one > more parameter. In order to keep backward compatibility, an existing cell will > be used to add this p

Re: [PATCH 0/3] at_hdmac: dt dma bindings update

2013-05-30 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 22:56 Thu 30 May , Vinod Koul wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 06:08:20PM +0200, ludovic.desroc...@atmel.com wrote: > > From: Ludovic Desroches > > > > Hi, > > > > This set of patches update the dt dma binding for at_hdmac since we need one > > more parameter. In order to keep backward co

Re: [PATCH 0/3] at_hdmac: dt dma bindings update

2013-05-31 Thread Nicolas Ferre
On 30/05/2013 22:13, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD : On 22:56 Thu 30 May , Vinod Koul wrote: On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 06:08:20PM +0200, ludovic.desroc...@atmel.com wrote: From: Ludovic Desroches Hi, This set of patches update the dt dma binding for at_hdmac since we need one more param