Adapt the GPIO driver to retrieve information from a DT file.
Note that since the driver is currently under cleanup, some hacks
will have to be removed after.
Add documentation for GPIO properties specific to OMAP.
Remove an un-needed whitespace.
Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson
Cc: Grant Likely
On Monday 26 September 2011 10:20 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
Adapt the GPIO driver to retrieve information from a DT file.
Note that since the driver is currently under cleanup, some hacks
will have to be removed after.
Add documentation for GPIO properties specific to OMAP.
Remove an un-needed
Hi Rajendra,
On 9/27/2011 7:40 AM, Nayak, Rajendra wrote:
On Monday 26 September 2011 10:20 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
Adapt the GPIO driver to retrieve information from a DT file.
Note that since the driver is currently under cleanup, some hacks
will have to be removed after.
Add documentation
I missed one comment...
On 9/27/2011 7:40 AM, Nayak, Rajendra wrote:
On Monday 26 September 2011 10:20 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
[...]
+Required properties:
+- compatible:
+ - "ti,omap2-gpio" for OMAP2 and OMAP3 controllers
Would it be more readable to have
"ti,omap2-gpio" for OMAP2 contr
On 09/28/2011 03:15 AM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> On 9/27/2011 7:40 AM, Nayak, Rajendra wrote:
>> On Monday 26 September 2011 10:20 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
>>> +Required properties:
>>> +- compatible:
>>> + - "ti,omap2-gpio" for OMAP2 and OMAP3 controllers
>>
>> Would it be more readable to have
On 9/28/2011 8:23 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 09/28/2011 03:15 AM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
On 9/27/2011 7:40 AM, Nayak, Rajendra wrote:
On Monday 26 September 2011 10:20 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
+Required properties:
+- compatible:
+ - "ti,omap2-gpio" for OMAP2 and OMAP3 controllers
Would it b
On 09/28/2011 03:57 PM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> On 9/28/2011 8:23 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> What does "the id" mean, in relation to the actual hardware?
>
> It's true that the description is not super meaningful...
> This is the HW instance number. We have 6 gpios, named gpio1 to gpio6,
> but the
Second thought... I was too fast to say OK :-)
On 9/27/2011 7:40 AM, Nayak, Rajendra wrote:
On Monday 26 September 2011 10:20 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
[...]
+ if (match) {
+ of_property_read_u32(node, "bank-width",&bank->width);
Bank width should be u32.
I guess you
