Re: [PATCH 1/1] Add Wondermedia Technologies (wmt) to docs/devicetree/vendor-bindings.txt

2012-07-19 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 19 July 2012, Tony Prisk wrote: > Which brings us back to the original question (and raises another one) - can > we assume yet that > 'wmt' will be the vendor-binding for Wondermedia? Also, what are we going to > use for VIA-based > SoC's given that VIA is the ticker for VIACOM. > >

RE: [PATCH 1/1] Add Wondermedia Technologies (wmt) to docs/devicetree/vendor-bindings.txt

2012-07-19 Thread Tony Prisk
...@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Add Wondermedia Technologies (wmt) to docs/devicetree/vendor-bindings.txt On Thursday 19 July 2012, Tony Prisk wrote: > I have no issue with that. > > I am mainly concerned with the Wondermedia products at the moment. > > Adding device tree support

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Add Wondermedia Technologies (wmt) to docs/devicetree/vendor-bindings.txt

2012-07-19 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 19 July 2012, Tony Prisk wrote: > I have no issue with that. > > I am mainly concerned with the Wondermedia products at the moment. > > Adding device tree support for WM8505 (and WM8650) is my main goal as the > WM8650 > currently isn't supported and trying to get another board file

RE: [PATCH 1/1] Add Wondermedia Technologies (wmt) to docs/devicetree/vendor-bindings.txt

2012-07-19 Thread Tony Prisk
gt; King; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Add Wondermedia Technologies (wmt) to > docs/devicetree/vendor-bindings.txt > > On Thursday 19 July 2012, Tony Prisk wrote: >> Given that there have been no replies to this thre

RE: [PATCH 1/1] Add Wondermedia Technologies (wmt) to docs/devicetree/vendor-bindings.txt

2012-07-19 Thread Tony Prisk
Wondermedia Technologies (wmt) to docs/devicetree/vendor-bindings.txt On Thursday 19 July 2012, Tony Prisk wrote: > Given that there have been no replies to this thread, and the restart patch > has > now been accepted using 'wmt' as the vendor namespace - would it be safe to > assu

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Add Wondermedia Technologies (wmt) to docs/devicetree/vendor-bindings.txt

2012-07-19 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Thursday 19 July 2012, Tony Prisk wrote: > Given that there have been no replies to this thread, and the restart patch > has > now been accepted using 'wmt' as the vendor namespace - would it be safe to > assume we should formalize this in the vendor-bindings.txt? > > I'd like to try and have

RE: [PATCH 1/1] Add Wondermedia Technologies (wmt) to docs/devicetree/vendor-bindings.txt

2012-07-18 Thread Tony Prisk
Alexey > Charkov > Sent: Wednesday, 18 July 2012 1:31 a.m. > To: vt8500-wm8505-linux-ker...@googlegroups.com > Cc: Tony Prisk; devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org; Russell King; > linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Add Wondermedi

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Add Wondermedia Technologies (wmt) to docs/devicetree/vendor-bindings.txt

2012-07-17 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 17 July 2012, Tony Prisk wrote: > From 756ae5c2f475d679649adff99058679b651af8d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Tony Prisk > Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 19:09:31 +1200 > Subject: [PATCH] Add Wondermedia Technologies (wmt) to vendor-prefixes.txt > Signed-off-by: Tony Prisk Something went