On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Linus Walleij (2013-06-09 03:55:47)
>> +static void pll_clk_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> +{
>> + struct clk_pll *pll = to_pll(hw);
>> + u32 val;
>> +
>> + return;
>
> Is the early return intentional? Everything els
Quoting Linus Walleij (2013-06-09 03:55:47)
> +static void pll_clk_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> + struct clk_pll *pll = to_pll(hw);
> + u32 val;
> +
> + return;
Is the early return intentional? Everything else looks good.
Acked-by: Mike Turquette
> +
> + spin_lock(&
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> The Nomadik clock implementation was a stub just using
> fixed clocks.
>
> This implements the clocks properly instead of relying
> on them all being on at boot and leaving them all on.
Mike, ping on this.
There was some debate on whether
The Nomadik clock implementation was a stub just using
fixed clocks.
This implements the clocks properly instead of relying
on them all being on at boot and leaving them all on.
The PLLs are on the top locking to the main chrystal
oscillator, then the HCLK for the peripherals are
below PLL2.
The
