Tomasz / Mark,
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 3:30 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Friday 07 of June 2013 11:24:04 Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 12:19:58PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> > This interesting case makes me think that regulator core should
>> > differentiate between regulator lookup
On Friday 07 of June 2013 11:24:04 Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 12:19:58PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > On Thursday 06 of June 2013 21:46:45 Doug Anderson wrote:
> > > dw_mmc is probed. This regulator is optional, though a warning will
> > > be printed if it's missing. The fact th
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 12:19:58PM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Thursday 06 of June 2013 21:46:45 Doug Anderson wrote:
> > dw_mmc is probed. This regulator is optional, though a warning will
> > be printed if it's missing. The fact that the regulator is optional
> > means that (at the moment)
Hi Doug,
On Thursday 06 of June 2013 21:46:45 Doug Anderson wrote:
> It is possible to specify a regulator that should be turned on when
> dw_mmc is probed. This regulator is optional, though a warning will
> be printed if it's missing. The fact that the regulator is optional
> means that (at th
It is possible to specify a regulator that should be turned on when
dw_mmc is probed. This regulator is optional, though a warning will
be printed if it's missing. The fact that the regulator is optional
means that (at the moment) it's not possible to use a regulator that
probes _after_ dw_mmc.
