Re: [PATCH 5/6] OF: Introduce Device Tree resolve support.

Hi Grant, On Mar 19, 2013, at 7:18 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:51:01 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou > wrote: >> Hi Grant, >> >> On Mar 16, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Grant Likely wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:58:02 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou >>> wrote: Hi David,

Re: [PATCH 5/6] OF: Introduce Device Tree resolve support.

On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:51:01 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > Hi Grant, > > On Mar 16, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Grant Likely wrote: > > > On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:58:02 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou > > wrote: > >> Hi David, > >> > >> On Jan 23, 2013, at 6:40 AM, David Gibson wrote: > >>> Ok. Nonethele

Re: [PATCH 5/6] OF: Introduce Device Tree resolve support.

Hi Grant, On Mar 16, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Grant Likely wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:58:02 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou > wrote: >> Hi David, >> >> On Jan 23, 2013, at 6:40 AM, David Gibson wrote: >>> Ok. Nonetheless it's not hard to avoid a recursive approach here. >> >> How can I find the maxi

Re: [PATCH 5/6] OF: Introduce Device Tree resolve support.

On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:58:02 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > Hi David, > > On Jan 23, 2013, at 6:40 AM, David Gibson wrote: > > Ok. Nonetheless it's not hard to avoid a recursive approach here. > > How can I find the maximum phandle value of a subtree without using recursion. > Note that the

Re: [PATCH 5/6] OF: Introduce Device Tree resolve support.

Hi David, On Jan 23, 2013, at 6:40 AM, David Gibson wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 01:06:09PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: >> Hi >> >> On Jan 22, 2013, at 6:05 AM, David Gibson wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:59:15PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: Hi David On Jan

Re: [PATCH 5/6] OF: Introduce Device Tree resolve support.

On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 01:06:09PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > Hi > > On Jan 22, 2013, at 6:05 AM, David Gibson wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:59:15PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > >> Hi David > >> > >> On Jan 21, 2013, at 6:48 AM, David Gibson wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, Jan 0

Re: [PATCH 5/6] OF: Introduce Device Tree resolve support.

Hi On Jan 22, 2013, at 6:05 AM, David Gibson wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:59:15PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: >> Hi David >> >> On Jan 21, 2013, at 6:48 AM, David Gibson wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:31:09PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: Introduce support for dynami

Re: [PATCH 5/6] OF: Introduce Device Tree resolve support.

On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:59:15PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > Hi David > > On Jan 21, 2013, at 6:48 AM, David Gibson wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:31:09PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > >> Introduce support for dynamic device tree resolution. > >> Using it, it is possible to p

Re: [PATCH 5/6] OF: Introduce Device Tree resolve support.

Hi David On Jan 21, 2013, at 6:48 AM, David Gibson wrote: > On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:31:09PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: >> Introduce support for dynamic device tree resolution. >> Using it, it is possible to prepare a device tree that's >> been loaded on runtime to be modified and inserted

Re: [PATCH 5/6] OF: Introduce Device Tree resolve support.

On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 09:31:09PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > Introduce support for dynamic device tree resolution. > Using it, it is possible to prepare a device tree that's > been loaded on runtime to be modified and inserted at the kernel > live tree. > > Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou

[PATCH 5/6] OF: Introduce Device Tree resolve support.

Introduce support for dynamic device tree resolution. Using it, it is possible to prepare a device tree that's been loaded on runtime to be modified and inserted at the kernel live tree. Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou --- .../devicetree/dynamic-resolution-notes.txt| 25 ++ drivers/of/