Re: [PATCH REPOST] Add test for re-defining an identical label

2012-07-08 Thread David Gibson
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 02:09:30PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: From: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com When merging one device tree over the top of a previous tree, it is possible to define a duplicate label that has the same name and points to the same property or node. This is currently

Re: [PATCH REPOST] Add test for re-defining an identical label

2012-07-08 Thread Jon Loeliger
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 02:09:30PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: From: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com When merging one device tree over the top of a previous tree, it is possible to define a duplicate label that has the same name and points to the same property or node. This is

Re: [PATCH REPOST] Add test for re-defining an identical label

2012-07-08 Thread David Gibson
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 01:44:04PM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote: On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 02:09:30PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: From: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com When merging one device tree over the top of a previous tree, it is possible to define a duplicate label that has the

Re: [PATCH REPOST] Add test for re-defining an identical label

2012-07-08 Thread Jon Loeliger
Applied. Hrm, apparently not pushed out, though. Rats. I am dumb. Should be there now. Sorry, jdl ___ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

[PATCH REPOST] Add test for re-defining an identical label

2012-07-03 Thread Stephen Warren
From: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com When merging one device tree over the top of a previous tree, it is possible to define a duplicate label that has the same name and points to the same property or node. This is currently allowed by the duplicate label checking code. However, alternative